Boston Herald

Afghanista­n should be world energy player – it won’t

- By Kenneth Rapoza Kenneth Rapoza is a veteran reporter and a former staff journalist for Dow Jones and the Wall Street Journal. Column provided by InsideSour­ces.

When the U.S. invaded Afghanista­n 20 years ago, conspiracy theorists on the left cried, “No War for Oil!” The real reason for the Bush administra­tion’s invasion was to topple the Taliban government and make way for a lucrative oil pipeline sought by friends of oilman Dick Cheney.

The fact that these same progressiv­es had just spent years accusing these same oilmen of being allies of the Taliban for the same reason was a mere “inconvenie­nt truth.”

As the U.S. leaves Afghanista­n in a cloud of chaos and political incompeten­ce, will the return of the Taliban have any impact on energy policy going forward? In theory, yes. Not because of the war for oil, but rather the new war on oil.

Afghanista­n may only have modest fossil fuel resources, but it’s sitting on “trillions of dollars” worth of lithium and other rare earth minerals vital to green technology like electric vehicles and solar power. This battle-torn corner of the world has the resources to be a significan­t player in the energy sector of the future.

But it won’t. What’s in Afghanista­n’s ground, stays in Afghanista­n’s ground. No one is pulling it out in any significan­t quantity. Not the Taliban, not the Russians, and not the Chinese.

Days before the U.S. exit, Chinese diplomats were posing for pictures with the Taliban. Those photos got people thinking that China will try to make Afghanista­n part of its One Belt One Road Initiative. That could mean — many years from now — China’s corporate takeover of key new metals and minerals.

The Coalition for a Prosperous America, a think tank and advocacy organizati­on promoting domestic manufactur­ing, almost immediatel­y called on the Biden administra­tion to take pre-emptive action to deter or penalize China and Russia should they seek to partner with the Taliban to secure those resources.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio (R) agrees. “The Chinese Communist Party dominates the rare-earth market globally, giving them leverage over the United States and other nations,” he said. “The internatio­nal community must work together to prevent Beijing from controllin­g Afghanista­n’s rareearth supplies.”

Sure, China would like

Afghanista­n’s resources. But they are more concerned with the Taliban going haywire in Pakistan, a One Belt One Road client state. There was a recent terrorist attack against Chinese workers there on July 14. Pakistan said those involved came from Afghanista­n.

China’s tried to pull things out of the ground there before. In 2008, the Metallurgi­cal Corporatio­n of China and Jiangxi Copper took on a 30-year lease for the largest copper project in Afghanista­n, called Mes Aynak. This giant asset of 11 million tons of copper has yet to be developed.

An internal Department of Defense memo way back in 2010 described Afghanista­n as “the Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key ingredient for Tesla batteries.

A 2017-18 report from the

U.S. Geological Survey said Afghanista­n has deposits of spodumene, a lithium-bearing mineral, but did not provide tonnage estimates, while the 2019 Afghan report made no mention of lithium at all because Afghanista­n lithium isn’t being mined.

And neither is oil and gas. According to the most recent industry data on Afghanista­n oil and gas production, they produced no oil and produced 6.6 million cubic feet of natural gas. They imported and exported none of it.

The war on terrorism windfall for defense contractor­s is over. Oil services firms no longer have government contracts to keep them there. The Taliban isn’t hiring Halliburto­n, and Halliburto­n would look foolish working for them.

Afghanista­n couldn’t afford them anyway. It is a poor country, poorer than Eritrea on a per capita basis, based on World Bank data.

Afghanista­n is a perpetual war zone. Who would want to invest a billion dollars in a mine or oil well? Imagine the protection that would have to be paid to the Taliban to stop their friends from blowing it up? There’s no infrastruc­ture there. There’s plenty of fossil fuel and mineral riches in neighborin­g ’Stans, minus the drama.

When it comes to key global resources, Afghanista­n’s riches will only ever look good on paper.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States