Dems claim to care about poor – just not poor smokers
The Tobacco Tax Equity Act (S. 1314 and H.R. 2786) that has been introduced in Congress would increase the federal excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products, as well as create a new federal excise tax on e-cigarettes.
Both versions of the legislation would double the excise tax on cigarettes from $1.01 per pack to $2.02 per pack, double the tax on roll-yourown tobacco, increase the tax on pipe tobacco by more than 16%, and “could increase the federal taxes paid on some premium cigars by more than 800%.” To be determined by the treasury secretary, e-cigarettes would be subject to the same tax rate as combustible cigarettes. All federal tobacco and vapor taxes would also be subject to future increases based on the rate of inflation.
The all-Democratic sponsors claim that according to data, “increasing the price of tobacco products is the single most effective way to reduce tobacco use, especially among youth.”
Unfortunately, while a feelgood measure, increasing cigarette taxes unduly burdens lower-income persons who 1. tend so smoke in greater numbers and 2. spend a greater share of their disposable income on tobacco products. Further, analyses show that increasing cigarette taxes does reduce smoking rates — but mostly among higher-income persons.
Not only do lower-income persons smoke in greater amounts, but they also spend more of their hard-earned dollars on combustible cigarettes. A Cato Journal article found that from “2010 to 2011, smokers earning less than $30,000 per year spent 14.2% of their household income on cigarettes.” Smokers that earned between $30,000 and $59,999 spent 4.3% and those earning more than $60,000 spent 2% of their income on cigarettes.
Higher taxes will also add to the existing black market for cigarettes.
The tax hike also comes amid uncertainty with electronic cigarettes and vapor products. Four states — including Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island — currently ban the sale of flavored e-cigarettes, with Massachusetts also banning the sale of menthol cigarettes. All of this is happening while the Food and Drug Administration is now just weeks away from a court-imposed deadline to approve e-cigarettes sales in the U.S. market.
Undoubtedly, the regulator landscape has already negatively impacted states. For example, long before the state imposed a flavored tobacco and vape ban, Massachusetts was already grappling with illegal cigarette smuggling. After Massachusetts increased the cigarette tax by $1.00 to $3.51-per-pack, economists at the state Department of Revenue estimated that untaxed cigarettes consumed in the state would increase, constituting “between $62 million and $246 million in uncollected excise taxes.” A 2017 study by the Mackinac Center found that illegal cigarettes that were brought into the commonwealth increased by more than 144%, from 12% in 2013, to 29.3% in 2014.
Massachusetts is currently battling another illicit market — illegal flavored tobacco and vapor products — which the state banned in June 2020.
The ban is estimated to have cost the state “more than $140 million on menthol cigarettes alone.” It’s not as if folks quit smoking or vaping, they went elsewhere, specifically neighboring states. In an analysis by the Tax Foundation, researchers found that sales of cigarettes “skyrocketed” in New Hampshire and Rhode Island (growing 55.8% and 56% respectively) between June 2019 and June 2020.
It should be noted that while Democrats claim that such tax increases will help reduce smoking prevalence, the rates of low-income persons as a percentage of adult smokers haven’t changed much since the last federal tobacco tax increase in 2009. For example, in 2009, 31.5% of adult smokers earned less than $15,000 and 28.1% reported incomes between $15,000 and $24,999. In 2019, 30.8% of current adult smokers reported earning incomes of $15,000 or less and 25.1% reported earning between $15,000 and $24,999.
Higher cigarette taxes will disproportionately harm lower-income persons and increase already existing black markets. Instead of adding an additional burden on poor smokers, lawmakers need to quit burning existing tobacco dollars and spend more of existing funding on tobacco control programs.