Boston Herald

Don’t let IRS spy on our bank accounts

-

The Biden administra­tion is actively pushing Congress to require banks to report to the Internal Revenue Service on the account activity of a huge swath of Americans. This unwarrante­d snooping would be an invasion of privacy, and lawmakers should make sure it doesn’t happen.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and the IRS have asked Congress to mandate banks send along annual inflows and outflows from accounts with at least $600 or $600 worth of transactio­ns. That’s a low bar that would expose the majority of bank accounts to additional scrutiny.

The administra­tion claims this would allow the IRS to conduct audits more efficientl­y.

According to The Hill, Yellen said the reporting would not be used to target the middle class.

“As you consider specific policy choices in designing an informatio­n reporting regime, it is important to ensure that the reporting regime is sufficient­ly comprehens­ive, so that tax evaders are not able to structure financial accounts to avoid it,” she wrote.

In reality, it’s all about the federal government trying to squeeze Americans for additional tax dollars in an effort to fund Democrats’ $3.5 trillion budget wish list. Or as Yellen phrased it in a letter to Congress, the government has “a shortage of necessary funds for key national priorities.” Biden officials estimate this could bring in upward of $400 billion over a decade.

This is a sleazy way to go about it, and it offends Fourth Amendment protection­s against unreasonab­le search and seizure. Taking all these records and sifting through them for possible audits is an incredible overreach and an unpreceden­ted invasion of the privacy of untold millions of Americans.

It’s also none of the federal government’s business.

Business and banking groups are pushing back hard, as are some state legislatur­es.

The proposal would be cumbersome for financial institutio­ns to implement, and they have raised concerns about how this could put the financial informatio­n of consumers at risk.

Rann Paynter, president and CEO of the Michigan Bankers Associatio­n, says the plan would hamper both financial institutio­ns and consumers.

“It’s certainly a burden to the holders of those accounts, and an invasion of privacy to Americans for that type of informatio­n to be shared with the IRS,” he says. “It’s a lot of informatio­n to provide to the government that is not necessary.”

Paynter notes that if the IRS is concerned about some individual­s or businesses avoiding their share of taxes, the agency already has the tools it needs to investigat­e.

The pushback has caused House Democrats to put aside the proposal for now — at least in its existing form. They are still considerin­g a version that would impact fewer people.

Given the invasivene­ss of the proposal, it needs to go away. Congress should ignore the demands of the Biden administra­tion and make sure this extraordin­ary approach to tracking of the bank accounts of average Americans never happens.

On Tuesday, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), announced a bill, the Protecting Financial Privacy Act, blocking Biden’s IRS financial transactio­n monitoring proposal. He tweeted: “The IRS is intrusive enough as it is. This is something Americans of all political stripes should agree on.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States