Boston Herald

GOP should embrace the lessons of Reagan

- By Rich Lowry Rich Lowry is editor-in-chief of National Review

Presumably, Donald Trump will never produce the dark secrets promised about Ron DeSantis’ past. But his team thinks it already has one — the Florida governor once was a Reagan Republican.

“There’s a pre-Trump Ron and there’s a post-Trump Ron,” someone in the Trump camp told Axios. “He used to be a Reagan Republican. That’s where he comes from. He’s now awkwardly trying to square his views up with the populist nationalis­t feeling of that party.”

In his CPAC speech doubling down on “MAGA,” Trump said, “We are never going back to the party of Paul Ryan, Karl Rove and Jeb Bush.” He didn’t mention Reagan, but the inclusion of the Gipper in the hall of shame was heavily implied.

This way of thinking in a Republican primary is something new. Once, pretty much every Republican wanted to be a Reagan Republican. If the Trump camp gets its way, Reaganism will have gone from passé in 2016 to an affirmativ­e vulnerabil­ity in 2024.

There are layers to this intra-Republican debate. It is certainly true that conservati­ves became overly obsessed with identifyin­g themselves with Ronald Reagan and when something becomes an -ism, it is likely to be simplified and ossified.

Then, there’s the sheer passage of time. Reagan left office 34 years ago. As of 2020, more than half of Americans were under age 40, meaning they have no real memory of Reagan.

Neither the pro- nor anti-Reagan side tends to do justice to the real, historical political figure. Reagan was a free marketeer but wasn’t doctrinair­e. He accepted the fact of the New Deal. He was a free trader, yet acted to protect American automakers and HarleyDavi­dson from Japanese imports.

If he was hawkish on foreign policy, he was always prudent. He was cautious about deploying U.S. troops overseas and contemplat­ed eliminatin­g nuclear weapons at a summit with Mikhail Gorbachev in Reykjavik. Although Reagan eventually came to define convention­al Republican­ism, he took on his party’s liberal establishm­ent and brought a populist voice to issues like the Panama Canal and crime.

At the end of the day, Reagan’s achievemen­ts are momentous and should be acknowledg­ed as such by all Republican factions. He set the predicate for winning the Cold War. He slayed inflation. He ended the energy crisis. He forced a turn to the center by the Democratic Party under Bill Clinton. He changed the mood of the country.

The example of Reagan, like that of all accomplish­ed statesmen, offers broad lessons that can be continuall­y drawn on — about how to balance prudence and principle, how to affect a large-scale political vision, how to deplore what ails the country without giving in to despair, and how to build coalitions.

The last may be most useful to DeSantis once he enters the nomination battle. To win, he is going to need to get a segment of Trump populists at the same time he locks down Republican voters who like Reagan more than Trump.

The Trump forces are going to try to make DeSantis’ roots in the party of Reagan disqualify­ing. Instead, played correctly, it can be a strength.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States