Boston Herald

U.S. military doesn’t need DEI programs

- By Rich Lowry Rich Lowry is editor in chief of the National Review

House Republican­s voted to end diversity, equity and inclusion programs and personnel at the Pentagon, and one wonders whether the U.S. military will ever be the same.

The provision was one of a number of anti-“woke” measures in the House-passed National Defense Authorizat­ion Act that have occasioned sputtering outrage.

According to National Security Council spokesman John Kirby, there’s no way that President Joe Biden would ever sign such legislatio­n “that would put our troops at greater risk or put our readiness at risk.”

America’s leaders used to worry that we wouldn’t have enough stopping power to defend against Soviet tanks potentiall­y pouring through the Fulda Gap or a survivable nuclear force in the event of a nuclear first strike; now they worry servicemem­bers might not be learning enough about microaggre­ssions.

Last year, Bishop Garrison, serving at the time as the senior advisor to the Secretary of Defense for human capital and diversity, equity and inclusion, said that diversity, equity and inclusion needs to be part of every decision that the military makes — it’s a “force multiplier,” and will make the military more lethal.

It’s not clear how this could possibly be true. Is the Marine operating a howitzer going to be more proficient if he’s familiar with the work of Ibram X. Kendi? Are our submariner­s lacking so long as they don’t know that it’s supposedly offensive to ask someone with an accent where he or she is from?

The U.S. military has been a model for decades of how to build a racially diverse institutio­n that is united by common purpose and standards. That doesn’t mean it is perfect — nothing is — but it was notably diverse long before anyone thought it needed diversity, equity and inclusion training.

Thankfully, by its standards, the Pentagon doesn’t spend much on diversity, equity and inclusion. It requested just $115 million in 2023, although that was an increase of nearly $30 million. This suggests that the personnel and programmin­g around diversity, equity and inclusion can be easily axed, and they should be.

Diversity, equity and inclusion is a scammy fad that has ballooned into a more than $3 billion industry even though there’s no solid evidence that it works, and it may well make things worse.

As the left-of-center author and podcaster Jesse Singal writes, diversity, equity and inclusion programs often “seem geared more toward sparking a revolution­ary re-understand­ing of race relations than solving organizati­ons’ specific problems.”

At the very least, diversity, equity and inclusion is another administra­tive burden. A recent report on the fighting culture of the U.S. Navy prepared at the direction of Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton and several Republican congressme­n noted that “non-combat curricula consume Navy resources, clog inboxes, create administra­tive quagmires, and monopolize precious training time.”

At worst, it is injecting a poisonous ideology into a fighting force that needs to look past racial and other divisions and needs to believe in this country’s worth.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States