Boston Herald

Dems dangle democracy threat to deflect from Biden’s record

Members of the legal community are familiar with the adage: If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table.

- Las Vegas Journal-Review/ Tribune News Service

A more terse truism might also apply to campaignin­g politician­s: If your record is laudable, pound your record; if your record is inferior, pound your opponent.

President Joe Biden has adopted the latter strategy. Having presided over the worst inflation in 40 years; an utter fiasco at the southern border; soaring utility costs for average Americans; trillions in new debt; skyrocketi­ng annual deficits; a massive expansion of the regulatory state; and a world engulfed in conflict, Biden — his poll numbers at record lows — has opted to change the subject and paint himself as an ardent defender of democracy against would-be dictator Donald Trump.

“Today we are here to answer the most important of questions: Is democracy still America’s sacred cause?” the president said this month during an address at Valley Forge. “This is not rhetorical, academic or hypothetic­al. Whether democracy’s still America’s ‘sacred cause’ is the most urgent question of our time, and it’s what the 2024 election is all about.”

He went on to say, “The defense, protection and preservati­on of American democracy will remain, as it has been, the central cause of my presidency. America, as we begin this election year, we must be clear, democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot.”

No need to read between the lines. The theme for Biden and Democrats this election year is crystal clear: We have a dismal record of governance so let’s petrify swing voters by arguing that the United States — embodying the vital concept of democracy — risks collapse if Trump is again sent to the Oval Office.

We’ll leave aside the absurdity of the premise that democracy is endangered if a controvers­ial candidate is duly elected through the democratic process or, for that matter, the question of how it serves democracy to allow unelected state officials to keep disfavored presidenti­al hopefuls off the ballot. For this over-the-top progressiv­e handwringi­ng to be an accurate assessment, virtually every institutio­nal check and balance in the country would have to acquiesce or fail.

How would Trump carry out this fiendish plot? Would Congress and the vice president stand down and go along? How about the entire federal judiciary and the Supreme Court? The military? Governors? State lawmakers? The American people?

There’s no indication that any of these checks — let alone all of them — would falter. In fact, recent history suggests the opposite.

Say what you will about the Jan. 6, 2021, fiasco, but the guardrails held. Vice President Mike Pence did his duty, those who participat­ed in illegal activity have been prosecuted, and Biden assumed office without delay. Meanwhile, Trump is tied up in various legal imbroglios.

Yet we’re supposed to believe that, if Americans toss Biden to the curb, Daniel Henninger of The Wall Street Journal observes, “we could be North Korea.”

Trump behaved shamefully on Jan. 6, and that’s obviously fair game for criticism during a campaign. Whether American voters want a return of his daily drama remains to be seen. But the notion that Trump will seize authoritar­ian powers if he is elected is a fantasy concocted by Democratic strategist­s trembling over Biden’s abysmal standing with voters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States