Boston Sunday Globe

Republican­s leery of Hunter Biden special counsel appointee

After demanding Weiss lead probe, GOP backpedals

- By Luke Broadwater and Maggie Haberman

WASHINGTON — Congressio­nal Republican­s have for months repeatedly written to Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding he appoint a special counsel to investigat­e Hunter Biden, the president’s son, over his business dealings.

Some even demanded that a specific man be named to lead the inquiry: David Weiss, the Donald Trump-appointed Delaware US attorney who has long investigat­ed the case.

But Friday, after Garland elevated Weiss to special counsel status, Republican­s in Congress reacted publicly not with triumph but outrage. “David Weiss can’t be trusted and this is just a new way to whitewash the Biden family’s corruption,” Republican­s on the House Judiciary Committee wrote on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter.

The reaction was a notable political developmen­t, one that underscore­d both how Weiss, a Republican, has fallen in conservati­ve circles and how deeply it has become ingrained in the GOP to oppose the Justice Department at every turn.

“The reality is this appointmen­t is meant to distract from and slow down our investigat­ions,” said Representa­tive Jason Smith, the Missouri Republican who chairs Ways and Means, one of three congressio­nal committees looking into the Biden family’s finances.

But in interviews, away from social media and television appearance­s, the reaction of many Republican­s to Weiss’s appointmen­t was more nuanced. Privately, some in the GOP were chalking up the developmen­t as a victory.

The party had worked for years to elevate the Hunter Biden case — which Democrats have long dismissed as a partisan obsession of the right — to a scandal equivalent to those dogging Trump, who has faced two impeachmen­t trials, two special counsel investigat­ions, and three indictment­s totaling 78 felony counts against him. Those indictment­s include charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States and willfully retaining national defense informatio­n after he left office.

By contrast, Hunter Biden has thus far been accused of two misdemeano­r crimes stemming from his failure to pay taxes on more than $1.5 million in income related to his overseas business deals, and one felony count of illegally possessing a firearm while being a drug user.

After leaving his job as a lobbyist while his father was running to become vice president more than a decade ago, Hunter Biden, a Yale-educated lawyer, and partners entered into a series of internatio­nal business relationsh­ips, often with firms seeking influence and access within the United States. He was paid handsomely, even as he descended into drug addiction, and Republican­s have accused him and his family of corruption. But they have not produced evidence that any of the overseas money went to Joe Biden or that the president influenced US policy to benefit his son’s business partners.

Even as they objected to Weiss, some Republican­s said the appointmen­t appeared to be an acknowledg­ment that the allegation­s they had made deserved a serious investigat­ion. It promised to keep Hunter Biden’s misdeeds in the news — and in the courts — for longer than Democrats would like as the 2024 presidenti­al election heats up. And it ensured that in the minds of some voters, the names Trump and Biden would both be linked to scandal.

In an interview with Newsmax, a top Trump adviser, Jason Miller, appeared to echo both sentiments and foreshadow­ed coming attacks.

Miller said the appointmen­t of Weiss “stinks” and accused the prosecutor of sitting on his hands for years. But, he added, “I do want to make sure that my Republican brethren” don’t “lose sight of the big prize here.”

He described the appointmen­t of a special counsel as “a direct acknowledg­ment that Hunter Biden did something wrong,” and he recalled Joe Biden saying in a 2020 debate with Trump that he had not done anything wrong.

For Democrats, the appointmen­t of a special counsel was hardly a welcome developmen­t. Yet, many Democrats were sanguine about a dark moment in a summer of cautiously bright news for their president. In interviews, more than a dozen Democratic officials, operatives, and pollsters said Hunter Biden’s legal problems were less worrisome than their other concerns about the president: his age, his low approval ratings, and Americans’ lack of confidence in an improving economy.

Part of their sense of calm stems from a version of the what-aboutism often adopted by Republican­s since Donald Trump’s rise: Biden’s son is under investigat­ion, Democrats say, but across the aisle, the GOP front-runner has actually been criminally indicted — three times.

“I find it hard to imagine that anyone concerned about political corruption would turn to Donald Trump to address the problem of political corruption,” said Representa­tive Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, which has been investigat­ing Hunter Biden since Republican­s took control of the chamber.

Democrats cited an array of reasons for whistling past the announceme­nt that Weiss would be elevated to a special counsel.

Polling, Democrats noted, has suggested that swing voters aren’t attuned to the various Hunter Biden controvers­ies. Recent elections, including the Ohio referendum this past week, have shown that the abortion rights issue is powering Democratic victories. And Democrats believe ne’er-do-well family members do not cause transitive harm to relatives who are running for president.

 ?? AL DRAGO/NEW YORK TIMES/FILE ?? Hunter Biden (above) has been accused of two misdemeano­rs and one felony. Attorney General Merrick Garland (below right) named a special counsel in the investigat­ion, a pick that Senator Chuck E. Grassley (below left) questioned.
AL DRAGO/NEW YORK TIMES/FILE Hunter Biden (above) has been accused of two misdemeano­rs and one felony. Attorney General Merrick Garland (below right) named a special counsel in the investigat­ion, a pick that Senator Chuck E. Grassley (below left) questioned.
 ?? KENNY HOLSTON/NEW YORK TIMES ??
KENNY HOLSTON/NEW YORK TIMES
 ?? KENNY HOLSTON/NEW YORK TIMES ??
KENNY HOLSTON/NEW YORK TIMES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States