Boston Sunday Globe

Confederat­e memorial at national cemetery will be removed

Army’s decision at Arlington irks Republican­s

- By Alex Horton

The Army intends to remove a Confederat­e memorial from Arlington National Cemetery this week as part of its ongoing work to rid Defense Department property of divisive rebel imagery, defying dozens of congressio­nal Republican­s who have vociferous­ly protested the move.

A woman representi­ng the American South, standing atop a 32-foot pedestal, lords above most other monuments within America's most revered resting place. It portrays, according to the cemetery's website, a “mythologiz­ed vision of the Confederac­y, including highly sanitized depictions of slavery.”

This month, 44 Republican lawmakers cautioned Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, the first African American to hold the post, that the Pentagon would overstep its authority by removing the memorial and demanded all efforts to do so stop until Congress works through next year’s appropriat­ions bill. The memorial “commemorat­es reconcilia­tion and national unity,” not the Confederac­y per se, the group led by Representa­tive Andrew S. Clyde of Georgia claimed.

The Army, which operates Arlington National Cemetery, informed lawmakers Friday that it would proceed with the monument's removal, officials told The Washington Post, because it was required by the end of the year to comply with a law to identify and remove assets that commemorat­e the Confederac­y. A congressio­nal commission had previously decided the memorial met the criteria for removal. The task will cost $3 million.

These officials spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivit­y of the issue. They said out of an abundance of caution that security at the cemetery would be enhanced when the work begins in coming days.

Workers will remove the memorial's bronze elements and leave its granite base in place to avoid damaging nearby gravesites, officials said. The Army is coordinati­ng with the state of Virginia and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservati­on, a federal agency, for its relocation.

“We want to make sure that it is situated within an appropriat­e historical context,” a senior Army official said.

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, a Republica, is disappoint­ed by the monument’s removal, said Macaulay Porter, a spokespers­on. Youngkin plans to relocate it at New Market Battlefiel­d State Park, which would be a “fitting backdrop” for the memorial, Porter said. The site is about 100 miles west of Arlington. It is unclear when that process would happen, but Army officials said the memorial will be moved to a storage facility for some time.

Removal of the memorial was recommende­d by a bipartisan congressio­nal commission appointed after the police murder of George Floyd in 2020 was followed by a wide-scale reckoning with the nation’s history of racism, and it marks a significan­t moment in the Defense Department’s mission to cleanse the US military of Confederat­e iconograph­y.

The commission found about 1,100 assets that commemorat­e the Confederac­y, including base names and street signs, and advised the Pentagon on what should be removed or changed.

The memorial at Arlington was the last significan­t item on that list, Army officials said, and its ouster comes just before the Jan. 1 deadline set by Congress.

The Lost Cause movement, which recast rebel traitors as morally righteous warriors defending states’ rights and spread the false belief that slavery was benevolent, is evident in the memorial’s bronze panels. A weeping Black woman, described by cemetery historians as a stereotypi­cal “mammy,” clutches the baby of a White officer, and a camp servant dutifully follows his enslaver toward battle.

The memorial’s Latin inscriptio­n directly references the idealized mythology of the Lost Cause, the cemetery’s historians say, further underscori­ng the deliberate historical distortion.

The marker was erected in 1914, part of a constellat­ion of Confederat­e markers that rose throughout the early 1900s to cement the ideals of white supremacy as Black Americans demanded equal rights.

That context must be understood, said Ty Seidule, a retired Army general who was the vice chair of the congressio­nal commission that recommende­d the monument’s removal from Arlington. While Republican lawmakers described the marker as an ode to reconcilia­tion, it was installed in what was then a racially segregated cemetery and molded in celebratio­n of an emerging racial police state in the South.

“It’s incredibly ironic the party of Lincoln is the one doing this,” said Seidule, a historian and visiting professor at Hamilton College, describing the GOP effort to stop the marker’s removal. “It is the cruelest monument in the country because it is so clearly proslavery.”

Workers will install safety fencing around the memorial before its removal begins, Army officials said. Protests are not permitted within Arlington Cemetery, and anyone who carries out such an action will be removed by law enforcemen­t, they added.

After the marker’s removal, the cemetery’s staff will develop a plan for signage intended to contextual­ize the bare pedestal.

Other groups have tried unsuccessf­ully to keep the memorial at Arlington. A lawsuit in federal court against the US military alleged that the decision to bring it down was made without sufficient public input. That suit was dismissed Tuesday, according to court filings.The Army said it did not anticipate another legal challenge before work begins this week.

The impending removal comes after the Army stripped the names of Confederat­e officers from nine installati­ons, replacing them with several minority and female soldiers who have been unrepresen­ted among celebrated troops for centuries.

 ?? BONNIE JO MOUNT/WASHINGTON POST. ?? It features a weeping Black woman that historians describe as a stereotypi­cal “mammy.”
BONNIE JO MOUNT/WASHINGTON POST. It features a weeping Black woman that historians describe as a stereotypi­cal “mammy.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States