Boston Sunday Globe

Kate, in disclosing cancer, quiets conspiracy theories

Rumors swirled about princess’s public absence

- By Mark Landler

LONDON — For more than two months, Catherine, Princess of Wales, had lost control of her story to a spiral of wild, baseless online rumors. On Friday evening, with a stark two-minute, 13-second video, she set out to reclaim it.

To do so, the princess, also known as Kate, had to deliver the wrenching news that she was battling a life-threatenin­g cancer, the kind of deeply personal disclosure that she and her husband, Prince William, have long resisted.

Kate, 42, made the decision herself to record the video, three people familiar with the planning process said Saturday. Earlier, she had decided to post an apology for digitally altering a photograph of herself with her three children, which set off a new round of conspiracy theories after it was released on Mother’s Day in Britain.

“This was pitch-perfect from her perspectiv­e,” said Peter Hunt, a former royal correspond­ent at the BBC. “The fact that it was a video was a rebuke to all those questions about her whereabout­s.”

In opting to go public this way, Kate has etched a place for herself in the annals of the British royal family and among the women of the House of Windsor. The video, in its frankness and barely concealed emotion, recalled Queen Elizabeth II’s televised message days after the car crash that killed Diana, Princess of Wales, in 1997.

Kate seemed to be modeling herself on Elizabeth, whose video was intended to douse another media firestorm, over whether she and the royal family had not displayed appropriat­e grief after Diana’s death. It also set her apart from Diana, who was ultimately a victim of the media currents that swirled around her.

Although Kate did not answer key questions about her illness — What form of cancer? How far has it spread? How long will she be treated with chemothera­py? — the announceme­nt could dispel most of the conspiracy theories that have enveloped her since she underwent abdominal surgery in January.

Like King Charles III, who confirmed last month that he, too, has cancer, the policy of partial disclosure seemed calculated to satisfy a relentless­ly curious news media and public, while preserving some measure of privacy. In Kate’s case, that seemed particular­ly important, given her three young children.

“They know they can’t control the online world,” Hunt said. “But they will hope the media will look hard at itself after this and stop recycling this nonsense. They’ll make clear to the papers that they have an expectatio­n of privacy.”

In a briefing Friday for reporters who cover the royal family, a spokespers­on for Kensington Palace gave the same answer five times to questions about the nature and extent of Kate’s cancer, where and how often she was being treated, and why she underwent surgery.

“We will not be sharing any further private medical informatio­n,” the spokespers­on said. “The princess has a right to medical privacy, as we all do.”

Kate’s hospitaliz­ation kicked off a cycle of speculatio­n that was extraordin­ary even by the standards of the royal family. Her medical condition, whereabout­s, and relationsh­ip with William were endlessly dissected on social media, even making it into the monologue of late-night television host Stephen Colbert.

Kensington Palace, where Kate and William have their offices, struggled to manage the crisis from the start. Its refusal to disclose details about her condition when she entered the hospital created an informatio­n vacuum that an online army quickly filled with increasing­ly outlandish theories.

When the palace distribute­d the photograph of Kate, accompanie­d by George, Charlotte, and Louis, it was meant to serve as a kind of proof-of-life image. But the plan backfired after the Associated Press, Reuters, and other news agencies found evidence that the image had been manipulate­d.

Far from quelling the speculatio­n, it ignited more rumors, leaving the palace unsettled and stung. At that point, people with knowledge of the process said, Kate decided to post on her social media account that she had been responsibl­e for editing the photograph, although it was taken by William.

The chaos deepened last week, after a video surfaced of Kate and William leaving a food shop near their home in Windsor. Although these people insisted that the palace did not orchestrat­e the sighting, officials did not push back on the newspapers that published the images, which was out of character for William, who has pressured papers not to run paparazzi-type photos.

That the couple would have to disclose Kate’s cancer was never in question, according to one of the people, who advised the palace in recent days and spoke on the condition of anonymity for privacy reasons. Allegation­s last week that staff members at the London Clinic, where Kate was treated, had tried to gain access to her private medical records were a reminder that it would be nearly impossible to keep that kind of informatio­n under wraps indefinite­ly.

The question was when and how. The couple chose Friday because it was the day their children began their school holiday, which meant they would not have to face questions on the playground about their mother’s illness.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States