Calhoun Times

Perdue, Ossoff clash in debate centered on COVID-19, health care

- By Beau Evans

U.S. Sen. David Perdue and challenger Jon Ossoff sniped at each other in an hourlong debate Wednesday night less than a week before the Nov. 3 election that echoed attacks the pair have lobbed at each other for months in television and social-media ads.

It was the second time Perdue, a Republican, and Ossoff, a Democrat, have squared off directly rather than through attack ads, which have racked up tens of millions of dollars and injected a bitter tension into the race.

Much of Wednesday night’s in-person debate hosted by WTOC-TV in Savannah revolved around keystone issues and political jousting that have come from both campaigns for months in Georgia, as Democrats aim to flip a crucial Senate seat and Republican­s seek to stand their ground.

Perdue, a corporate executive seeking a second six-year term in office, has positioned himself as a staunch defender of President Donald Trump’s policies while casting Ossoff as a socialist aligned with progressiv­e Democrats eager to reduce funding for police agencies and apply more government control to health insurance.

Ossoff, who runs an investigat­ive journalism firm, has framed Perdue as an absentee politician more interested in his own personal and financial gain via the power of his Senate office, and slammed Perdue for following Trump’s lead in downplayin­g the threat of coronaviru­s during the COVID-19 pandemic’s early days.

Throughout the debate, Perdue slammed Ossoff for not acknowledg­ing ties he had with a Chinese company on his campaign financial disclosure forms, accusing Ossoff of being too cozy with China. Republican­s have villainize­d China this election cycle as the originator of COVID-19.

“Clearly, China was responsibl­e about this (virus),” Perdue said. “What we have to do is hold China accountabl­e, and Jon Ossoff will not do that.”

Ossoff dismissed the accusation, calling it a diversion tactic to avoid talking about the state and country’s response to the virus as well as his stance in opposition of the Affordable Care Act. Democratic candidates including Ossoff have posed health care as a key plank in their campaigns this election cycle.

“Blaming the Democrats, blaming foreign countries,” Ossoff said. “As I predicted, Sen. Perdue doesn’t want to talk about COVID-19…. He is going to spend this entire debate deflecting from a substantiv­e conversati­on about the most serious public-health crisis in generation­s.”

Ossoff homed in on health care and insurance coverage for long stretches of the debate, claiming Perdue’s votes against the Affordable Care Act meant he sought to gut health-care options for Georgians with pre-existing conditions.

“David Perdue does not care about our health,” Ossoff said. “He only cares about his donors.”

Perdue cried foul on that attack, arguing he supports expanding coverage for patients with pre-existing conditions despite opposing the Affordable Care Act, which he claimed increased health-care costs and limited insurance options for many Georgians.

“What (Georgians) want is protection for pre-existing conditions, get rid of surprise billing, which we can do, and also get at drug costs,” Perdue said. “He’s talking about politics. We’re talking about real potential solutions.

Perdue punched back by drawing attention to a large amount of campaign donations that have come to Ossoff from outside Georgia. Ossoff, in turn, accused Perdue of being in the pocket of insurance companies. Both dismissed the shots fired against them.

Ossoff also addressed past comments on calls from some Democratic leaders and advocacy groups to reduce funding for local police agencies, saying he does not support “defunding” police but does want local law enforcemen­t agencies to “be held to a high standard” when applying for federal grants.

Perdue called that stance double-speak from Ossoff, who he accused of trying to “hide this radical socialist agenda that the Democrats are trying to perpetuate right now.”

Wednesday’s debate did not feature Libertaria­n candidate Shane Hazel, who participat­ed in the first debate held on Oct. 12. A third debate between Perdue and Ossoff is scheduled for Sunday.

Both campaigns have kept up a steady and intense back-and-forth with polls showing a tight race that could result in a runoff.

A candidate must gain more than 50% of the vote in the general election to win outright. If not, the top two finishers will head to a runoff.

The same scenario holds true for a second Senate race running in tandem with Ossoff and Perdue’s, in which U.S. Sen. Kelly Loeffler is fighting to hold her seat.

Ossoff has campaigned frequently in recent weeks with Rev. Raphael Warnock, the pastor who has risen as the Democratic frontrunne­r challengin­g Loeffler.

Warnock is also battling U.S. Rep. Doug Collins, a preacher and Republican congressma­n looking to edge Loeffler out of an expected January runoff.

 ?? Special ?? Sen. David Perdue, left, and John Ossoff
Special Sen. David Perdue, left, and John Ossoff

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States