Calhoun Times

Two maps, two visions: Georgia’s political power for next decade hangs in the balance

- By Tim Darnell

ATLANTA — Democrats and Republican­s will converge at the state Capitol Nov. 3 to begin redrawing Georgia’s congressio­nal districts, a once-a-decade exercise to accommodat­e population shifts reflected in the U.S. Census.

Both parties are offering vastly different visions for how Georgia should be represente­d in Congress, with Republican­s seeking to maintain their majority in the Peach State’s 14-member U.S. House delegation and Democrats looking to even things up.

Georgia House and Senate Democrats showed their cards Oct. 21 by releasing a proposed congressio­nal map ahead of the special legislativ­e session. Democrats said their map would provide a fair opportunit­y for voters of color in Georgia to elect representa­tives of their choice, as minorities would make up a majority of the residents in six of the 14 districts (Districts 2, 4, 5, 7, 10 and 13).

“We are focused on maps that fairly reflect Georgia,” said state Sen. Elena Parent, D-Atlanta. “We’ve had a lot of growth in minority groups. We believe the maps should reflect these significan­t changes.”

But with Republican­s in control of the General Assembly, any map Democrats suggest – whether a congressio­nal map or proposed boundaries for state House and Senate districts – promises to be dead on arrival.

For the GOP, the key question will be whether to try to regain one of the two congressio­nal seats in Atlanta’s northern suburbs lost to the Democrats during the last two election cycles or go for

broke and try to take back both seats.

A congressio­nal map Georgia Senate Republican­s released in late September appears to take the more cautious approach. It goes after the 6th Congressio­nal District seat Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Marietta, won in 2018 by moving heavily Republican Forsyth County into the district and removing portions of North Fulton and North DeKalb counties more friendly to Democrats.

Brian Robinson, a former top aide to then-Gov. Nathan Deal and a Republican political commentato­r, said Democratic inroads in recent years have left the GOP without the voting strength to take back both the 6th and 7th district seats.

“We can’t draw 6 and 7 as Republican districts,” he said. “But the opportunit­y is there to bring back one Republican.”

Earlier this month, the Princeton Gerrymande­ring Project, along with RepresentU­s, a nonpartisa­n anticorrup­tion organizati­on, gave the GOP map a “C” on its Redistrict­ing Report Card, based on partisan fairness, competitiv­eness and geographic features. The organizati­on said its “C” grade means the proposed map is average, and could be better but also worse.

The same report card gave the Democrats’ map a “B” for partisan fairness and said the map would give a slight partisan advantage to Democrats. It also gave the Democratic map two “C’s”

for competitiv­eness and geographic features.

“If all levels of government are to be responsive to the needs of Georgians in education, health care, and infrastruc­ture for the next 10 years, the state needs a community-based districtin­g process,” said Jack Genberg, an attorney for the Southern Poverty Law Center.

“So far in this process, the leaders of the Georgia legislatur­e have shown a disdain for the public and their needs. They’ve run a sham process.”

Genberg said legislator­s scheduled all of their community meetings on redistrict­ing before census numbers were actually released.

“Legislator­s made these predata, pre-guideline meetings inaccessib­le to wide swaths of Georgians whose first language is not English, Georgians with mobility issues and other disabiliti­es, those who are hearing impaired, and people unable to attend in-person events during a resurging pandemic or because of work or family obligation­s,” Genberg said.

RepresentU­S recently ranked Georgia as one of 35 states that are most at-risk for partisan gerrymande­ring. The organizati­on said risks are high because new election maps can be controlled and drawn by politician­s in secret and rigged for partisan gain. It also said so-called “rigged” election maps are hard to challenge in court.

Democrats say their map also is likely to lead to a 7-7 split in Georgia’s congressio­nal delegation. Currently, there are eight Republican­s in Congress representi­ng Georgia and six Democrats.

“Georgia has changed significan­tly over the last decade, and our proposed congressio­nal map reflects that growth,” said U.S. Rep. Sanford Bishop, D-Columbus. “Georgia voters should choose their representa­tives, not the other way around, and this map guarantees that.”

The GOP map was overseen by Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan and state Sen. John Kennedy, RMacon, who chairs the Senate Reapportio­nment and Redistrict­ing Committee.

“This map not only meets principles of redistrict­ing, but we are proud to present a map that regardless of political party, Georgians can be proud of,” Duncan said when the map was released. “Ensuring that any maps we produce are fair,

compact, and keep communitie­s of interest together

will continue to be of upmost importance.”

 ?? Special ?? The Georgia House and Senate Democratic caucuses released their own proposed congressio­nal map ahead of the special legislativ­e session starting Nov. 3.
Special The Georgia House and Senate Democratic caucuses released their own proposed congressio­nal map ahead of the special legislativ­e session starting Nov. 3.
 ?? ?? John Kennedy
John Kennedy
 ?? ?? Sanford
Bishop
Sanford Bishop
 ?? ?? Geoff Duncan
Geoff Duncan
 ?? ?? Elena Parent
Elena Parent

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States