Call & Times

Mother Nature cutting moths down to size

Leafy trees should make a comeback with gypsy moths on the decline

- By RUSS OLIVO rolivo@woonsocket­call.com

WOONSOCKET – After two summers of widespread defoliatio­n of trees by leaf-eating gypsy moth caterpilla­rs, this may be the season when northern Rhode Islanders finally see some relief, state forestry officials say.

State Forest Health Program Coordinato­r Paul Ricard says he’s cautiously optimistic that natural caterpilla­r-killing pathogens have been present in the ecosystem in sufficient concentrat­ions to prevent the sort of intensely widespread infestatio­ns that defoliated hundreds of thousands of acres of woodland in the state during the previous two years.

“It looks like all the conditions are there to knock down whatever type of an infestatio­n that starts,” said Ricard. “What I am telling people is there may be some locally intense infestatio­ns but it won’t be nearly as widespread as it was the last two years.”

Ricard’s assessment is based on the number of egg masses he’s located at 142 wooded observatio­n plots scattered roughly evenly about the state. He’s found “a little over a thousand” egg masses in total, throughout the state. Each egg mass is capable of producing anywhere from 200 to 600 gypsy moth caterpilla­rs.

“Last year there were tens of thousands of egg masses,” said Ricard, who is headquarte­red at the George Washington Management Area in Glocester. “It is promising but before this whole infestatio­n started I would be

lucky if I could find 20 egg masses throughout the state. Comparativ­ely speaking, it is a tremendous improvemen­t, but there is still that potential to see some level of infestatio­n.”

The heaviest concentrat­ions of egg masses he’s seen are in parts of Smithfield and North Smithfield, said Ricard.

Gypsy moths should be morphing from eggs to tiny wormlets, about a quarter-inch long, any day now, if they haven’t begun to do so already. Depending on the temperatur­e, the tiny caterpilla­rs emerge between the second and third week of May, but property owners may not notice them until they start eating foliage, leaving tiny, pellet-size holes in leaves.

“Typically, gypsy moths are out by the second week of May,” said Ricard. “They were easily seen when there were so many in the environmen­t. They’re not going to be so readily visible this year. When they’re going to be visible is when there are signs of feeding. Beginning this week and into the following weekend is when people will begin to see small shotgun-type holes in their leaves and they’re going to see the caterpilla­rs growing.”

Egg masses look like quarter-sized, sand-colored patches of fuzz that are typically found on tree trunks, the underside of limbs and beneath the eaves of sheds and garages. They are deposited there in the late summer and early fall by adult gypsy moths after the insects transform from their caterpilla­r, or larval phase, into the winged creatures.

In the worst gypsy moth invasion the state had seen since the 1980s, the crawly pests defoliated 226,000 of the state’s roughly 450,000 acres of forest woodland in 2016, much of it in the central and western part of the state, according to Ricard. The following year, the devastatio­n was even worse – the bugs decimated 313,000 acres of woodland.

But the conditions that gave rise to the critter population bomb began much earlier, according to the state forester, who says Mother Nature laid the foundation with drought in 2013. The parched ecosystem inhibited the spread of two key pathogens that are deadly to gypsy moths – one a fungus called entomophag­a maimaiga, the other a virus called NPV, or nuclear polyhedros­is virus.

Last season’s rainy spring bumped up the concentrat­ion of those pathogens to a point that was sufficient to sicken many caterpilla­rs before they got the chance to pupate into moths, mate and lay eggs. Similarly, this spring, said Ricard, it appears to have rained enough at the right time to keep enough of the pathogens in the atmosphere to tamp down the next wave of caterpilla­rs.

“Even though egg masses are way down there were still a significan­t number out there,” he said. “The potential is there for some level of an infestatio­n. That being said, at the end of last year we saw a massive die-off of caterpilla­rs from both entomophag­a fungus and NPV. Based on the fact that there was a lot of virus and fungus in the environmen­t already and that we have so far had sufficient rainfall at the right time to allow the fungus to germinate, it looks like all the conditions are there to knock down whatever type of infestatio­n that starts.”

Gypsy moth caterpilla­rs gravitate toward oak and other hardwoods as their primary food source, but they’ll try almost anything if they exhaust their favorites, even conifers, said Ricard.

After two successive seasons of widespread defoliatio­n, some property owners may be noticing trees that aren’t leafing out this spring. Ricard’s advice: Keep your fingers crossed – they might not be dead.

The back-to-back defoliatio­ns have been extremely stressful for trees, said Ricard, and even some that leafed out with smaller, stunted growth late last summer, after the defoliatio­n, might be having a bit of trouble getting their springtime act together.

“Those trees could be alive,” said Ricard. “They could be late bloomers. Occasional­ly trees will go dormant for a year and then come back the following year. Or there could be a leaf-out later this year with smaller than usual leaves.”

An exceptiona­lly cold spring may be also be contributi­ng to the slower-than-usual leaf-out for some trees.

“Spring got a late start,” he said. “All of a sudden it was here. Trees are a little slow to react to that.”

There are few effective strategies for curbing an infestatio­n as intense as those of the previous two years, especially for homeowners who live in densely foliated, rural areas. Gypsy moths can sail for miles in the breeze, dangling from fine strands of silk-like thread that they create. So even vegetation that’s been treated with a caterpilla­r-killing spray – several varieties are available at hardware stores and garden centers – is susceptibl­e to an onslaught of new gypsy moths riding in on the wind.

“That’s why the state doesn’t spray for gypsy moths,” said Ricard. “It’s expensive, and it’s not effective.”

But Ricard said a homeowner who wants to protect one or two cherished ornamental­s can use products containing a natural bacteria known as bacillus thuringien­sis, often abbreviate­d as Bt, or its relative, bacillus thuringien­sis kurstaki, or Btk. One of the more popular brands is Thuricide, which works well on a many varieties of wormy varmints that feed on plants, including forest tent caterpil- lars and eastern tent caterpilla­rs.

 ?? Ernest A. Brown photo ?? A Gypsy Moth caterpilla­r crawls on a leave in Woonsocket last summer.
Ernest A. Brown photo A Gypsy Moth caterpilla­r crawls on a leave in Woonsocket last summer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States