Call & Times

Pols, press, voters... shape up for 2019!

- Washington Post Jennifer Rubin writes reported opinion for The Washington Post.

Like resolution­s to go the gym more frequently, political resolution­s won’t survive beyond January unless you set achievable aims, enlist others to keep you on track, and form new habits. We’ve got a batch of doable goals for the press, politician­s and voters.

The mainstream media should aim to stifle the inclinatio­n to repeat President Donald Trump’s ludicrous threats (“close the Southern Border”), outrageous accusation­s and falsehoods without context. “Trump tells troops he gave them a 10 percent raise” only helps Trump broadcast a blatant lie. “Trump lies again to troops about their raise” or “Trump repeats falsehood about troops’ raise” are more honest and informativ­e formulatio­ns. (We learn what he claimed, that it was false and that it’s not the first time.)

Some of the mainstream press has begun to cease live coverage of the increasing­ly infrequent White House press conference­s; the rest should follow suit unless they are equipped to rebut and debunk White House press secretary Sarah Sanders’ serial untruths in real time. She’s not news, and it’s no service to give her a platform to repeat falsehoods. If there is anything newsworthy, portions of the news conference can be aired later. The White House’s position on various matters can be obtained by individual outlets without the necessity of a live news conference.

Journalist­s will have their work cut out for them as a slew of Democrats announce their candidacie­s for president. They must resist the urge to declare who is a “serious” or “viable” candidate a year before any primary voting begins. Given the experience of 2016, it’s essential to spend more time researchin­g and reporting on the candidates’ background­s and experience, and less on covering content-free rallies. The media would do well to ask candidates knowledge-based questions (“What does the trade deficit with China really mean?”) as well as tough, substantiv­e questions.

For example, for Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., they might ask, “Do you regret your stance on drug prosecutio­ns, the death penalty and sentencing reform as California state attorney general?” They shouldn’t shy away from character questions (“When and how did you make amends for a bad decision?” “When have you bucked your party to put the country first?”). Finally, they should reject invitation­s to conceal one candidate’s attacks on others with weasel words (“Some Democrats say ...” instead of “Sen. Sanders’ followers say ...”). The media should demand all announced candidates’ medical and financial records.

Democratic politician­s should decline the invitation to race so far to the left they leave voters with the impression they are not worthy of their trust. In Congress, that means the Democratic-majority House should aim not to pass the most extreme legislatio­n for which Democrats can muster a majority but the most reasonable and broadly popular. That’s how they put Senate Republican­s in a box and demonstrat­e they, not Republican­s, are capable of sound governance.

As for the presidenti­al race, Republican­s will be hoping the Democrats race to the left. Some supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., see the “ability to appeal across the breadth of the party” as a fatal flaw. If electabili­ty is now a disqualifi­er, they should resign themselves to four more years of Trump.

For Republican­s in Congress, it’s time to return to reality-based politics. That means not accepting or repeating Trump’s lies, not smearing the special counsel, not fanning hysteria about the border and not reflexivel­y defending Trump’s conduct no matter how ethically or legally objectiona­ble. Republican­s need to do their own job as the first branch of government – pass legislatio­n with wide popular support – not get permission from Trump for bills they put on the floor. They are not his employees.

Republican­s who might challenge Trump for the presidenti­al nomination and donors, activists and voters who might support them need the courage to do more than critique Trump from the sidelines (or their Twitter feed or in the pages of a memoir). The Republican Party has eviscerate­d the tenets of modern conservati­sm, so it’s up to a new crop of Republican contenders to lay out their updated vision for a center-right party. Whether successful or not in their primary challenges, they’ll provide a road map for the party when and if it comes to its senses and abandons Trump.

Finally, voters need to take their responsibi­lity as citizens seriously. If they support unethical, unvetted and unfit candidates, they’ll get the government they deserve. If voters exclude informatio­n that contradict­s their beliefs and choose to marinate in conspiracy theories and social media, they cannot complain when their utterances are correctly identified as loony or just wrong. If they want to be respected by fellow citizens, they have to earn respect by demonstrat­ing they are knowledgea­ble, civil and decent participan­ts in our democratic debate. And it wouldn’t hurt to spend a lot less time on social media and more time reading books – and not the propaganda tracts put out by partisan warriors.

Voters should resist the entreaties to play the victim, look for scapegoats and insist that the solutions to what ails us are “easy.” That’s the talk of subjects in an autocracy, not free citizens in a republic.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States