Call & Times

We need to fix stingy insurance plans

- By Cecille Joan Avila, Paul Shafer and Megan B. Cole

President Joe Biden promised on the campaign trail to expand the Affordable Care Act to cover more of the roughly 29 million nonelderly Americans (about 11% of that population) who remain uninsured. He also said he’d strengthen the law by, for instance, providing an accessible and affordable public option and increasing tax credits to make it easier for people who buy insurance on their own to afford monthly premiums. Once in office, Biden immediatel­y moved to reopen the period when people could enroll in the ACA marketplac­es.

Unfortunat­ely, the administra­tion is paying little heed to a problem that is in many ways just as insidious as lack of insurance: underinsur­ance. This means they get too little from the insurance plans that they do have.

After passage of the ACA, the number of Americans lacking any insurance fell by 20 million, dropping to 26.7 million in 2016 – a historic low as a percentage of population. The figure began to creep up again during the Trump administra­tion, reaching 28.9 million in 2019. That’s the problem that the current administra­tion wants to address, and it certainly needs attention.

But according to research by the Commonweal­th Fund, a foundation focused on health care, 21.3% of Americans have insurance so skimpy that they count as underinsur­ed: Their out-of-pocket healthcare expenses, excluding premiums, amount to at least 5% to 10% of household income. The limits in coverage mean their plans might provide little financial protection in a health care crisis.

High-deductible plans offered by employers are one part of the problem. Among people covered by the companies they work for, enrollment in high-deductible health plans rose from 4% in 2006 to 30 % in 2019, according to a report from the Kaiser Family Foundation. The average annual deductible­s in such plans are $2,583 for an individual and $5,335 for families.

In theory, high-deductible plans, which make people spend lots of their own money before insurance kicks in, turn people into careful consumers. But research finds that people covered by such plans skip care, both unnecessar­y (elective cosmetic surgery, for instance) and necessary (cancer screenings and treatment, and prescripti­ons). Black Americans in these plans disproport­ionately avoid treatment, widening racial health inequities.

Health savings accounts are designed to blunt the harmful effects of high-deductible plans: Contributi­ons by employers, and pretax contributi­ons by individual­s, help to cover costs until the deductible is reached. But not all high-deductible health plans offer such accounts, and many people in lower-wage jobs don’t have them. In the rare cases that they do, they often don’t have extra money to deposit in them.

In a November 2020 article in the journal Health Affairs, scholars affiliated with Brown University and Boston University found that enrollment in high-deductible plans had increased across all racial, ethnic and income groups from 2007 to 2018; they also found that low-income, Black and Hispanic enrollees were significan­tly less likely than other groups to have a health savings account – and the disparitie­s had grown over time.

The short-term health care plans – a.k.a. “junk” plans – that the Trump administra­tion expanded also contribute to the problem of underinsur­ance. They often have low premiums but do not cover preexistin­g conditions or basic services like emergency health care.

Fortunatel­y, proposals like Biden’s that make health care more affordable and accessible also tend to address the problem of underinsur­ance, at least in part. For example, to make individual-market insurance more affordable, Biden proposes expanding the tax credits establishe­d under the ACA. His plan calls for removing the cap on financial assistance, now set at 400% of the federal poverty level, in the insurance marketplac­es and lowering the statutory limit on premiums to 8.5% of income (from nearly 10%).

The president also proposes to peg the size of the tax credits that subsidize premiums to the best plans on the marketplac­es, the “gold” plans, rather than “silver” plans. This would increase the size of these credits, thereby making it easier for Americans to afford more-generous plans with lower deductible­s.

The most ambitious Biden proposal is a public option, which would create a Medicare-like offering on marketplac­es, available to anyone. Pairing this with allowing any American to opt out of their employer plan if they found a better deal on HealthCare.gov or their state marketplac­e – which they can’t now – would help some people escape high-deductible plans. The public option would also eliminate premiums and involve minimal to no cost-sharing for low-income enrollees – especially helpful for uninsured (and underinsur­ed) people in states yet to expand Medicaid.

Given political realities, however, this policy may not see the light of day. So it would be best to target underinsur­ance directly. Most people with high-deductible plans get them through an employer. Yet unlike in the marketplac­e plans, the degree of cost sharing in these employer plans is the same for low-income as well as high-income employees. To deal with that problem, the government could offer incentives for employers to expand the scope of health services they cover even in high-deductible plans. Already, many such plans exempt from the deductible some primary-care visits and generic-drug prescripti­ons. The list could grow to include follow-up visits and certain specialist care.

Instead of encouragin­g health savings accounts, the government could offer greater pretax incentives that encourage employers to absorb some of the costs that they have shifted onto their lower-income employees; that would help to prevent the insurance equity gap from widening further. The government could compensate employers that cover co-pays or other costs for their low-income employees. It could also subsidize employers that move away from high-deductible plans, at least for lower-income people.

The ACA expanded coverage dramatical­ly – but the government needs to make sure that coverage amounts to more than an unused insurance card.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States