Call & Times

Biden bids farewell to Forever War

- PAT BUCHANAN

³It is time to end the forever war.´

6o said 3resident -oe Biden in his announceme­nt that, as of 6ept. , the 20th anniversar­y of the attacks on the :orld 7rade Center and 3entagon, all 8.6. troops will be gone from Afghanista­n.

7he longest war in our history, which cost 2, 00 dead, 20,000 wounded and 2 trillion, is ending ± ± but only for Americans, not Afghans.

6ecretary of 6tate Antony Blinken assured our 1A7O allies in Brussels that we are all leaving with our mission accomplish­ed

³7ogether we went into Afghan- istan to deal with those who attacked us and to make sure that Afghanista­n would not again become a haven for terrorists who might attack any of us.

³:e have achieved the goals we set out to achieve,´ the secretary said. ³1ow it’s time to bring our forces home.´

But while the 8.6. military did not lose a major battle, we Americans did not win this war. Our enemies are stronger, and they control more territory today than they have since their overthrow in 200 .

7hey have reconstitu­ted themselves under fire, control half of the country and can cut roads to the capital of .abul. And in our mission to build a democratic Afghanista­n that could sustain itself long after we depart, we failed.

And we have no guarantee al-4aida will not reestablis­h itself in Afghanista­n. )or the most probable successors to the regime we are leaving behind are the same 7aliban we drove from power in 200 .

And while the 7aliban did not defeat us, they have bled the Afghan army we helped to create and train, and outlasted the 8nited 6tates and a 1A7O alliance that emerged victorious from a 0-year cold war with the 6oviet (mpire.

As we depart Afghanista­n before summer’s end, the

, 00 1A7O troops there will be leaving with us. 7hat this is viewed as no strategic victory may be seen from the reaction of those who most consistent­ly supported the war, conservati­ve 5epublican senators.

6aid 0ajority /eader 0itch 0cConnell of Biden’s announceme­nt

³3recipitou­sly withdrawin­g 8.6. forces from Afghanista­n is a grave mistake . ... )oreign terrorists will not leave the 8nited 6tates alone simply because our politician­s have grown tired of taking the fight to them.´

6aid /indsey *raham

³It is insane to withdraw at this time given the conditions that exist on the ground in Afghanista­n . ... A full withdrawal from Afghanista­n is dumber than dirt and devilishly dangerous ... 3resident Biden will have, in essence, canceled an insurance policy against another

6aid the ranking 5epublican on armed services, -im Inhofe

³1o one wants a forever war, but ... any withdrawal must be conditions-based. Arbitrary deadlines would likely put our troops in danger, jeopardi]e all the progress we’ve made ... lead to civil war in Afghanista­n ± ± and create a breeding ground for internatio­nal terrorists.´

But if we failed in Afghanista­n, why did we fail?

Our enemies, the 7aliban, motivated by a religious faith many would call fanaticism, were more willing to sacrifice, suffer, fight, bleed and die for longer than we or our Afghan allies.

7he 7aliban are (ric +offer’s ³7rue Believers.´

Also, it is their country, after all, not ours. It is everything to them, not so much to us. 7hey are steeped in the traditiona­l Afghan hostility to foreigners and hatred of those who come to their land to tell them how they should live and rule themselves.

7he 7aliban captured the flags of anti-colonialis­m, nationalis­m and Islamic fundamenta­lism.

7here is talk that, should the 7aliban topple the government, bring down the regime and engage in reprisals and atrocities, American troops might surge back in.

0y sense is no. :hen we go this time, we’re gone for good. /ike the Brits in the th century and 5ussians in the 20th, when we go, we will not return.

7he greatest blunder came in 200 , when *eorge :. Bush was persuaded by the neoconserv­atives to invade IraT and covert that country into America’s model democracy for the 0iddle (ast.

Our -year struggle in IraT following the invasion of 200 has proven even most costly in lives and treasure than the war in Afghanista­n.

After IraT came the interventi­on in 6yria’s civil war to back rebels seeking to oust 3resident Bashar Assad. After that came the 8.6.-1A7O interventi­on in the /ibyan civil war and America’s interventi­on on the side of 6audi Arabia in

)or a generation now, we have been stomping barefoot on anthills and throwing rocks into bees’ nests across the 0iddle and 1ear (ast.

And to what avail?

7he nation-builders, the democratis­ts, the liberal interventi­onists, the 1ew :orld Order crowd are, today, being repudiated by Biden’s decision to write off their 20-year project in the +indu .ush.

One wonders :ill they soon start calling Biden an isolationi­st?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States