Withholding food stamps hurts rehabilitation
Getting back on your feet after serving time in prison is not easy. Even for those of us lucky enough to find support, hunger, homelessness and hopelessness are all too common barriers to rehabilitation and a real second chance.
Many people who serve time in prison are all but excluded from the job market once they are free. Often, low-wage jobs with irregular hours and no benefits are the only option. Having access to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps, can make all the difference for Americans working hard to reintegrate into society and restart their lives.
But some in Congress are trying to pull the rug out from under thousands of Americans who have served their sentences for violent crimes, even in cases where the crimes are decades in the past and the sentences are completed. Instead of the shortsighted version of the farm bill that passed the House, which would ban people embracing a second chance from ever participating in SNAP, our representatives need to work on bipartisan bills that support SNAP, like the one the Senate passed last week.
America is a country of second chances. For many, SNAP benefits are a big part of that second chance. Food assistance helps keep those who have served their time out of poverty and homelessness. It helps them support their families and keep food on the table for their kids.
There already are restrictions to make sure SNAP benefits don’t go to those who have violated parole or the terms of their release. But denying assistance to everyone who has been found guilty of a violent crime, including those who have served their sentences and are working hard at healing themselves, goes too far and would leave many with nowhere to turn to put food on their tables.
This misguided policy wouldn’t just threaten the food security of individuals who were incarcerated. It also would threaten food security for their families. Low-income families and children would be at increased risk of food insecurity, all for helping a family member succeed with their rehabilitation and providing them shelter.
Instead of offering hope and supporting rehabilitation, a lifetime ban on SNAP benefits would undermine reintegration and hurt families. Nothing about this policy would improve public safety – it would just put more Americans, including children, at risk of going hungry.
This amendment also would perpetuate the racial injustice that continues in our prison system. AfricanAmericans are incarcerated five times more often than white Americans. And low-income African-Americans would be hit the hardest by this ban. Elderly African-Americans convicted of even one crime decades ago would be at particularly high risk of food insecurity under this mis- guided policy.
That doesn’t align with what we believe justice should be in this country. Elected leaders on both sides of the aisle have been working for years to support those re-entering society to become productive and successful members of their communities.
Helping feed Americans who are trying to get their lives back on track shouldn’t be a partisan issue, and evidence suggests SNAP can help reduce crime by providing food to those struggling to meet their basic needs.
Instead of politically motivated attacks on crucial supports like SNAP, the House should support the Senate’s bipartisan version of the farm bill, and all of Congress should be looking for ways to facilitate re-entry and rehabilitation so America can deliver on its promise of a second chance.
The new House SNAP bill could take food stamps away from some of the people who need them the most.