De­ploy­ing US troops to bor­der could cost $200M

The Charlotte Observer (Sunday) - - News - BY PAUL SONNE

The price of Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s mil­i­tary de­ploy­ment to the bor­der, in­clud­ing the cost of Na­tional Guard forces that have been there since April, could climb well above $200 mil­lion by the end of 2018 and grow sig­nif­i­cantly if the de­ploy­ments con­tinue into next year, ac­cord­ing to an­a­lyst es­ti­mates and Pen­tagon fig­ures.

The de­ploy­ment of as many as 15,000 troops to the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der – po­ten­tially equal in size to the U.S. troop pres­ence in Afghanistan – oc­curs as the bud­getary largesse the mil­i­tary has en­joyed since Trump took of­fice looks set to come to an end.

Although the costs of the bor­der de­ploy­ments will be a tiny slice of a $716 bil­lion an­nual de­fense bud­get, they ar­rive as the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion is call­ing on the Pen­tagon to cut un­nec­es­sary ex­pen­di­tures. The White House re­cently ordered the Pen­tagon to slash next year’s bud­get for the mil­i­tary by about $33 bil­lion in re­sponse to the largest in­crease in the fed­eral deficit in six years.

Vet­er­ans and Demo­cratic law­mak­ers have com­plained that Trump is wast­ing mil­i­tary dol­lars in a po­lit­i­cally mo­ti­vated stunt ahead of Tues­day’s midterm elec­tions, at a time when the Pen­tagon bud­get is un­der pres­sure.

“In­stead of work­ing in a bi­par­ti­san man­ner to make com­pre­hen­sive, com­mon­sense, and hu­mane re­forms to our im­mi­gra­tion sys­tem, the Pres­i­dent con­tin­ues to turn to po­lit­i­cally-mo­ti­vated fear mon­ger­ing and uses (De­part­ment of De­fense) re­sources and per- son­nel as a means to drive his trou­bling anti-im­mi­gra­tion agenda,” more than 100 House Democrats wrote in a let­ter to De­fense Sec­re­tary Jim Mat­tis on Thurs­day.

Re­tired Gen. Martin Dempsey, for­mer chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, de­scribed the de­ploy­ment as waste­ful in a mes­sage on Twit­ter and said Marines and sol­diers were al­ready over­stretched.

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials have de­fended the de­ploy­ment. Mat­tis said this week that the mil­i­tary doesn’t do stunts. The com­mis­sioner of Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion, Kevin McAleenan, ar­gued that the de­ploy­ment is nec­es­sary to “ef­fec­tively and safely” han­dle the pos­si­ble ar­rival of as many as 7,000 mi­grants walk­ing to­ward the bor­der in car­a­vans from Cen­tral Amer­ica.

But mil­i­tary planning doc­u­ments, dated Oct. 27 and pub­lished by Newsweek, pre­dicted that only 20 per­cent of the mi­grants, or about 1,400 at the higher end of es­ti­mates, were likely to com­plete the jour­ney to the bor­der, rais­ing ques­tions about the size of the de­ploy­ment.

“The mil­i­tary has a lot of things that it needs to be do­ing these days,” said Su­sanna Blume, a for­mer Pen­tagon of­fi­cial and se­nior fel­low at the Cen­ter for a New Amer­i­can Se­cu­rity. “Look­ing at es­ti­mates of the size of the car­a­van, you could ask the ques­tion as to whether this is the most ap­pro­pri­ate use of U.S. ac­tive-duty forces.”

It isn’t clear how many U.S. troops will end up on the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der.

About 2,000 forces from the Na­tional Guard are al­ready there, oper­at­ing un­der an or­der Trump is­sued in April. North­ern Com­mand has said more than 7,000 ad­di­tional ac­tive-duty troops will join them in Ari­zona, Texas and Cal­i­for­nia. Trump this last week that he will be de­ploy­ing be­tween 10,000 and 15,000 troops but didn’t make clear whether those fig­ures in­cluded the Na­tional Guard.


Mem­bers of the U.S. mil­i­tary tour the McAllen-Hi­dalgo In­ter­na­tional Bridge with U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Pa­trol agents Satur­day in McAllen, Texas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.