Chattanooga Times Free Press - ChattanoogaNow

In John Krasinski’s ‘A Quiet Place,’ Silence Means Survival

- BY JEANNETTE CATSOULIS

True to its title, John Krasinski’s “A Quiet Place” tiptoes forward, camera fixed on the naked, padding feet of the Abbott family as they scavenge in a deserted supermarke­t.

A title card announces Day 89 — of what, we don’t know — so we look for clues. Lee and Evelyn ( Krasinski and his reallife wife, Emily Blunt) and their three children communicat­e urgently in sign language, and the youngest child’s interest in a battery- operated toy causes immediate alarm. Their fear is palpable, but what are they afraid of?

Thanks to that darned toy, we’re about to find out, in a perfectly executed attack sequence that establishe­s the stakes, and the family’s plight, with swift efficiency. Now minus one and watched by flapping posters of other missing souls, the Abbotts return to their farm as the story ( by Bryan Woods and Scott Beck) leaps forward more than a year. Evelyn is now preparing to give birth, Lee is teaching his son (Noah Jupe) to forage, and their daughter (played by the remarkable young deaf actor, Millicent Simmonds) is angrily chafing against her parents’ protective­ness.

A welcome alternativ­e to the mind-shredding din of virtually any modern action movie, “A Quiet Place” is an old-fashioned creature feature with a single, simple hook: The creatures are blind, hungry and navigate by sound. Possessed of craniums from a central conceit that’s far from uncommon. From “The Walking Dead” to the Emmy- nominated “Hush,” a 1999 episode of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” in which spindly supernatur­al killers steal people’s voices, the relationsh­ip between silence and survival has been repeatedly explored. More recently, movies like “It Follows” and “The Babadook” have used the absence of sound to create dreamy sequences that throb with unspoken menace.

Taking this device to an extreme that feels strangely novel, Krasinski imposes rigorous restrictio­ns on his cast and crew that produce unexpected­ly sensual benefits. The countrysid­e around the farm is a symphony of wind and waterfall and rustling leaves; the production design inside the farmhouse is warm and intimate and crammed with evidence of the family’s intricate strategies to minimize risk. And the full-on action sequences, staged with stalking tension in settings as diverse as a grain silo and a bathtub, are nervily potent.

Neither intellectu­ally deep nor even logically sound ( press any soft spot and the whole plot caves in), “A Quiet Place” feels at odds with a musical score that too often wants to tell us when to jump, and how high. Yet in its convincing portrayal of a situation where a rusty nail is as lethal as an unexploded bomb, and the few remaining inhabitant­s seem — much like the audience — more likely to die of stress than anything else, the movie rocks.

 ?? PARAMOUNT PICTURES ?? Emily Blunt, left, and Millicent Simmonds in “A Quiet Place.”
PARAMOUNT PICTURES Emily Blunt, left, and Millicent Simmonds in “A Quiet Place.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States