Delay of clean power plan stokes worries about Paris treaty
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration asserted Wednesday a Supreme Court order delaying enforcement of its new clean-power rules will ultimately have little impact on meeting the nation’s obligations under the recent Paris climate agreement.
But environmentalists and academic experts are more nervous.
They are concerned that any significant pause in implementing mandated reductions in carbon dioxide emissions from coalfired power plants will imperil the credibility of the U.S. to lead on climate change, while increasing worries both at home and abroad the whole international agreement might unravel if a Republican wins the White House in November.
Nearly 200 countries agreed in December to cut or limit heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the first global treaty to try to limit the worst predicted impacts of climate change. The goal is to limit warming to no more than an additional 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Each nation set its own goals under the treaty, and President Barack Obama committed the U.S. to make a 26 to 28 percent cut in U.S. emissions by 2030.
The Clean Power Plan is seen as essential to meeting that goal, requiring a one-third reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants over the next 15 years. Even before the Environmental Protection Agency released the plan last year, a long list of mostly Republican states economically dependent on coal mining and oil production announced they would sue.
Though the case is still pending before an appeals court in Washington, a 5-4 majority on the Supreme Court issued a surprising order Tuesday barring any enforcement of the plan until the legal challenge is resolved. Whichever side loses at the appeals level is almost certain to petition for review by the high court, almost certainly freezing any significant action on the plan’s goals until Obama’s term ends.