Chattanooga Times Free Press

Why the South is anything but solid for Clinton or Trump

- BY GREG BLUESTEIN

The South is hardly a political monolith that votes in neat lockstep. But this presidenti­al election threatens to fracture the region unlike any other in decades, smashing what once was called the “solid South” into a purply stew.

Republican­s are playing defense in territory once considered safe harbor for conservati­ves, and top GOP strategist­s openly talk of relying on the same strategy that helped a generation of Democrats win local races even as the region was turning red.

Florida and Virginia could give its bounty of electoral votes to the Democrats for the third straight presidenti­al election, and Hillary Clinton’s campaign is honing in on North Carolina. Georgia and even South Carolina could be competitiv­e this year, and demographi­c changes could transform Southern

“I’m not worried — I see the change. I think [Clinton’s] going to pick up North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida because of the grass-roots movement.”

— BARBARA LEE, VIRGINIA “Oh, [Trump will] carry the South. He wants to protect our borders, safeguard the Second Amendment, defend religion. He’s not a politician.”

— MELISSA MOORE TRUELL, ALABAMA

neighbors’ electorate­s in the next decade.

At the same time, conservati­ves are consolidat­ing their strength in deep-red bastions such as Alabama and leveraging the powerful advantage the GOP retains in much of the region thanks to the way congressio­nal districts are drawn. And some Republican leaders are testing new messages and innovative policies to brace for the demographi­c changes.

November’s election comes as the South asserts itself in new ways. The advent of the “SEC primary,” the March votes featuring mostly Southern states, helped shape the presidenti­al contest. Clinton and Republican Donald Trump have since crisscross­ed the region, adding stops in Mississipp­i and flood-ravaged Louisiana to the plethora of visits to Southern battlegrou­nd states.

The attention has left voters in both camps more energized. And polarized.

“Oh, he’ll carry the South,” Melissa Moore Truell, an educator waiting for a meeting in her central Alabama town, said of Trump. “He wants to protect our borders, safeguard the Second Amendment, defend religion. He’s not a politician; he’s a businessma­n and he’s an American.”

But Barbara Lee, a retiree from Staunton, Va., said she can almost feel the South turning blue.

“I’m not worried — I see the change,” Lee said at a getout-the-vote rally in Virginia. “I think [Clinton’s] going to pick up North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida because of the grass-roots movement.”

A STRONGHOLD NO LONGER

The South was for decades a stronghold for Democrats, though a renegade ticket led by Strom Thurmond briefly splintered the region in 1948. By the mid-1960s, that began to change.

President Lyndon Johnson, after signing the 1964 Civil Rights Act, predicted the Democratic Party had “lost the South for a generation.” That same year, conservati­ve Barry Goldwater won only six states for the Republican Party, but five of them were in the South.

In 1968, George Wallace — who came to national prominence by declaring “segregatio­n now, segregatio­n tomorrow, segregatio­n forever” — took the Thurmond approach, winning Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississipp­i and one electoral vote from North Carolina as a third-party candidate.

Republican Richard Nixon, employing his “Southern strategy,” won every other state in the South that year except for Texas. The Republican Party, especially under Ronald Reagan, then transforme­d the region into a bulwark for the GOP.

Bill Clinton of Arkansas picked off Georgia and a few Southern states in his 1992 campaign, but the beachhead was short-lived. It was Barack Obama, though, who might have splintered the region for good. He won North Carolina, Virginia and Florida in 2008 and followed that up with a victory in the latter two states in 2012.

The Republican counterrev­olt after Obama’s election, though, was devastatin­g to Southern Democrats. The tea party movement breathed new life into conservati­ves, putting Democrats in swing districts across the region on the defensive.

By 2014, the GOP reclaimed U.S. Senate seats in Arkansas and Louisiana, and it ousted U.S. Rep. John Barrow of Augusta, the last white Democrat in the House of Representa­tives from the Deep South. But Democrats made gains, too, putting John Bel Edwards and Terry McAuliffe in the governor’s mansions in Louisiana and Virginia.

Democratic strategist­s are already looking to the next decade, when they hope growing numbers of black and Hispanic voters — who helped Obama win Southern states — could shape the votes in the South’s biggest states well into the next decade.

Democrats hope Republican­s and independen­ts skeptical of Trump could hasten the changes. Libertaria­n Gary Johnson is polling double-digits in Georgia and some of its neighbors, and Trump’s divisive remarks and controvers­ial policies could turn off college-educated white voters who helped fuel the GOP’s success.

Charlie Cook of the nonpartisa­n Cook Political Report recently silenced a room of some of Georgia’s most influentia­l business leaders when he outlined the bad news that November will likely bring for Republican­s. Given Clinton’s dismal favorabili­ty rating, he said, any Republican would likely have had a better shot at beating Clinton than Trump.

“In short, if Republican­s nominated a potted plant, they’d probably win. Even with the structural advantages against the Republican Party that we have right now,” Cook said, adding that Ohio Gov. John Kasich or another “fairly innocuous” candidate “would have beaten Hillary Clinton like a rented mule.”

A CAMPAIGN GAME OF CHICKEN

While Trump and Clinton joust over Florida and North Carolina — both states seem crucial to the Republican­s’ election chances — complicate­d maneuverin­g is unfolding in some of the neighborin­g states. Talk of Clinton’s new investment and hires in Georgia led Trump’s running mate, Mike Pence, to make a recent two-day visit to the Peach State.

In an interview, Pence said he was certain the campaign’s themes would resonate across Southern states, most of which Trump won by hefty margins in the party’s primaries.

“The message of a strong military, a strong America on the world stage, of revitalizi­ng the American economy through less taxes, less regulation, more American energy, and smarter and tougher trade deals” reverberat­es in the South, Pence said. “It’s resonating across Georgia and across the country.”

Emory University political scientist Alan Abramowitz said it’s hard to decipher Trump’s unpredicta­ble campaign strategy.

“But I suspect Trump will be spending his time in the traditiona­l swing states as well and they will just hope that Georgia will end up in the GOP column as usual,” he said.

At the same time, though, more Southern Republican­s are under pressure to distance themselves from Trump by using the very same blueprint their Democratic brethren used in decades past.

Veteran Republican pollster Whit Ayres said down-ticket GOP candidates could help preserve their elections by giving “no more than lip service” to Trump while focusing on local achievemen­ts in their districts.

It’s much like the strategy employed by U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson, who has endorsed Trump but largely avoids his name on Georgia’s campaign trail.

Just as important to the GOP’s vitality in the South, Ayres said, was tapping into voter unrest while appealing to the growing number of minority voters the party needs to remain viable.

“The challenge from the Republican Party is to be able to accept that anger and frustratio­n,” said Ayres, “and turn it into a productive direction.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States