Chattanooga Times Free Press

Iran dominates in Iraq after U.S. opened door

- BY TIM ARANGO NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

BAGHDAD — Walk into almost any market in Iraq and the shelves will be filled with goods from Iran — milk, yogurt, chicken. Turn on the television and channel after channel will broadcast programs sympatheti­c to Iran.

A new building goes up? The cement and bricks likely came from Iran. And when bored young Iraqi men take pills to get high, the illicit drugs are likely to have been smuggled across the porous Iranian border.

And that’s not even the half of it.

Throughout the country, Iranian-sponsored militias are hard at work establishi­ng a corridor to move men and guns to proxy forces in Syria and Lebanon. And in the halls of power in Baghdad, even the most senior Iraqi cabinet officials have been blessed, or bounced out, by Iran’s leadership.

When the United States invaded Iraq 14 years ago to topple Saddam Hussein, it saw Iraq as a potential cornerston­e for a democratic, Western-facing Middle East, and vast amounts of blood and treasure were poured into the cause.

From Day 1, Iran saw something else: a chance to make a client state of Iraq, a former enemy against which it fought a war in the 1980s so brutal, with chemical weapons and trench warfare, that historians look to World War I for analogies. If it succeeded, Iraq would never again pose a threat, and it could serve as a jumpingoff point for Iran to spread its influence.

In that contest, Iran won, and the U.S. lost.

Over the past three years, Americans have focused on the battle against the Islamic State in Iraq, returning more than 5,000 troops to the country and helping to force the militants out of Iraq’s second-largest city, Mosul.

But Iran never lost sight of its mission: to dominate its neighbor so thoroughly Iraq could never again endanger it and to use the country to effectivel­y control a corridor from Tehran to the Mediterran­ean.

“Iranian influence is dominant,” said Hoshyar Zebari, who was ousted last year as finance minister because, he said, Iran distrusted his links to the United States. “It is paramount.”

The country’s dominance over Iraq has heightened sectarian tensions around the region, with Sunni states, and U.S. allies, such as Saudi Arabia mobilizing to oppose Iranian expansioni­sm. But Iraq is only part of Iran’s expansion project; it has also used soft and hard power to extend its influence in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Afghanista­n, and throughout the region.

Iran’s influence in Iraq is not just ascendant, but diverse, projecting into military, political, economic and cultural affairs.

At some border posts in the south, Iraqi sovereignt­y is an afterthoug­ht. Busloads of young militia recruits cross into Iran without so much as a document check. They receive military training and are then flown to Syria, where they fight under the command of Iranian officers in defense of the Syrian president, Bashar Assad.

Iran tips the scales in its favor in every area of commerce. In the city of Najaf, it even picks up the trash, after the provincial council there awarded a municipal contract to a private Iranian company.

One member of the council, Zuhair al-Jibouri, resorted to a nowcommon Iraqi aphorism: “We import apples from Iran so we can give them away to Iranian pilgrims.”

Iran has a large number of allies in Iraq’s parliament who can help secure its goals. And its influence over the choice of interior minister, through a militia and political group the Iranians built up in the 1980s to oppose Saddam, has given it substantia­l control over that ministry and the federal police.

Partly in an effort to contain Iran, the United States has indicated it will keep troops behind in Iraq after the battle against the Islamic State. U.S. diplomats have worked to emphasize the government security forces’ role in the fighting and to shore up a prime minister, Haider al-Abadi, who has seemed more open to the United States than to Iran.

But after the United States’ abrupt withdrawal of troops in 2011, U.S. constancy is still in question — a broad failure of U.S. foreign policy, with responsibi­lity shared across three administra­tions.

Iran has been playing a deeper game, parlaying extensive religious ties with Iraq’s Shiite majority and a much wider network of local allies, as it makes the case that it is Iraq’s only reliable defender.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States