Chattanooga Times Free Press

10 Monkeys and a Beetle: Inside VW’s campaign for ‘Clean Diesel’

- BY JACK EWING NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

FRANKFURT, Germany — In 2014, as evidence mounted about the harmful effects of diesel exhaust on human health, scientists in an Albuquerqu­e, N.M., laboratory conducted an unusual experiment: Ten monkeys squatted in airtight chambers, watching cartoons for entertainm­ent as they inhaled fumes from a diesel Volkswagen Beetle.

German automakers had financed the experiment in a bid to prove that diesel vehicles with the latest technology were cleaner than the smoky models of old. But the American scientists conducting the test were unaware of one critical fact: The Beetle provided by Volkswagen had been rigged to produce pollution levels that were far less harmful in the lab than they were on the road.

The results were being deliberate­ly manipulate­d.

The Albuquerqu­e monkey research, which has not been previously reported, is a new dimension in a global emissions scandal that has already forced Volkswagen to plead guilty to federal fraud and conspiracy charges in the United States and to pay more than $26 billion in fines.

The company admitted to installing software in vehicles that enabled them to cheat on emissions tests. But legal proceeding­s and government records show that Volkswagen and other European automakers were also engaged in a prolonged, well-financed effort to produce academic research that they hoped would influence political debate and preserve tax privileges for diesel fuel.

The details of the Albuquerqu­e experiment have been disclosed in a lawsuit brought against Volkswagen in the United States. The organizati­on that commission­ed the study, the European Research Group on Environmen­t and Health in the Transport Sector, received all of its funding from Volkswagen, Daimler and BMW. It shut down last year amid controvers­y over its work.

The organizati­on, known by its German initials EUGT, did not do any research itself. Rather, it hired scientists to conduct studies that might defend the use of diesel. It sponsored research that challenged a 2012 decision by the World Health Organizati­on to classify diesel exhaust as a carcinogen. It financed studies that cast doubt on whether banning older diesel vehicles from cities reduced pollution.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States