THE GREAT S-WORD HYPOCRISY
Breaking news: President Donald Trump uses profanity.
When Trump’s apparent use of the word “s***hole” makes headlines, one cannot help but recall the analysis of the media provided by President Obama’s deputy national security adviser and foreign policy speechwriter. In discussing his perception of reporters’ ignorance of foreign affairs, Ben Rhodes said: “Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing.” Presidents curse.
President Lyndon Baines Johnson taped himself cursing and using racial epithets. President Richard Nixon taped himself cursing, using racial epithets and making anti-Semitic comments. Then-presidential candidate George W. Bush was caught on a hot mic calling reporter Adam Clymer a “majorleague a—hole from The New York Times.” Former ABC reporter Ann Compton says that on at least two occasions, President Barack Obama launched into off-the-record “tirades” against the media. In one case, Compton described the president’s scolding as “profanity laced.”
But in Trump’s case, critics claim his recent use of profanity corroborates, underscores and advances the narrative that the President is “racist.”
What about President Obama?
He, too, made a Trump-like statement about the cultural superiority of one group over another. In April 2016, The Atlantic published an article about President Obama’s foreign policy challenges, a frustrated Obama complaining about the difficulty of achieving peace in the Middle East. Obama said, “If only everyone [in the Middle East] could be like Scandinavians, this [achieving peace] would all be easy.”
Note to Rep. Al Green: Norway is Scandinavian country. Again, Obama made the same point as did Trump — yet no one called Obama “racist.”
Obama also called Libya, an African country, a “s*** show” following his admittedly failed military intervention in 2011.
Few Trump-haters appear to have read “The Dark Side of Camelot” by former New York Times writer Seymour Hersh. He writes that President John F. Kennedy was warned about a wealthy, high-profile Democrat, who not only supported another candidate but tried to get evidence of Kennedy’s alleged extra-marital liaisons. Later, when some senators pushed for a high-profile ambassadorship for this Democratic donor, Kennedy did not forget. “I’m going to f*** him,” Kennedy said. “I’m going to send him to one of those boogie republics in Central Africa.” “Boogie republics” does not sound like a term of endearment.
As for Trump’s “racism,” he must be putting forth policies to harm blacks, right? But Trump seeks to empower urban parents through education vouchers so that parents can opt out of an underperforming public school. Trump wants to stop illegal immigration. Economists like Harvard’s Jorge Borjas claim that urban American workers without high school diplomas face competition for jobs against unskilled illegal workers, who also put downward pressure on the wages of those U.S. workers.
In an era where activists unfairly brand police as racist profilers, Trump supports the cops. The bogus Black Lives Matter movement has caused an increase in murder and other types of violent crime in cities like St. Louis, (right outside Ferguson) and Baltimore. The victims of this increased crime are disproportionately black — the very people the activists purport to care about. In one year of the Trump administration, blacks have seen an increase in the labor force participation rate and blacks are enjoying record low levels of unemployment.
If Trump wants to practice racism, his incompetence has been staggering.