Chattanooga Times Free Press

IN RUSSIA PROBE, FRINGE CHARACTERS TAKE STAGE

- Washington Post Writers Group

WASHINGTON — In the bizarre double helix that is the Russia investigat­ion, one of the recurring themes is the role of wouldbe influencer­s. They start off as connectors and facilitato­rs, but gradually (and implausibl­y) they move to the center of

the story.

That’s true with Stefan Halper, the retired American professor at Britain’s Cambridge University who has become the object of President Trump’s counter-witch hunt to expose a supposed FBI mole who infiltrate­d his campaign. The FBI is guarding Halper’s identity as it should any trusted informant, but he was named a week ago by conservati­ve news sites and then by other publicatio­ns.

It’s outrageous that Trump has encouraged “outing” this putative intelligen­ce source. And this latest attempt to deflect special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion only adds to suspicion that Trump has something very big to hide.

But it’s laughable to imagine

Halper as a superspy, infiltrati­ng the heart of the Trump campaign. Those who know Halper describe someone closer to a gregarious busybody and academic eccentric — an intellectu­al who jostles for first billing on a book cover — than a mole burrowing toward Trump’s inner circle. Like many underemplo­yed ex-professors, he likes to gossip, and perhaps that made him a good intelligen­ce source. But this is not James Bond.

A former British intelligen­ce officer who knows Halper well describes him as “an intensely loyal and trusted U.S. citizen [who was] asked by the Bureau to look into some disconcert­ing contacts” between Russians and Americans. Isn’t that what the FBI and its sources are supposed to do?

The professor is just one of the unlikely figures who populate the edges of the Trump-Russia investigat­ion.

Another such middleman who has become a central character is George Nader, a Lebanese-born operative who worked for the United Arab Emirates. According to news reports, Nader tried to channel UAE money to people close to the Trump campaign to mobilize support for Emirati efforts against Iran and Qatar.

Nader is a familiar gadfly to people who follow the Middle East. Since the mid-1980s, he has been a profession­al intermedia­ry, trying to freelance connection­s between America and the Arab world. It’s a mystery why the UAE, a sophistica­ted country that can buy the best expertise in the intelligen­ce business, would turn to a character like Nader.

Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman who was indicted last year by Mueller, is another influence peddler who now looms larger than life. Through more than 40 years in politics, Manafort has been hustling his connection­s to try to make his way to the big show. Mueller’s allegation­s of fraud and money laundering make Manafort sound like a master player, but a close reading of Manafort’s life describes a series of missed opportunit­ies and squandered money.

Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch, is another odd character who hovers on the fringes of this story. Manafort tried to impress Deripaska with his Trump credential­s, presumably hoping it would prove lucrative. Weirdly, leaked text messages show that Deripaska’s American lawyer tried to make a connection

between Sen. Mark Warner, ranking member of the intelligen­ce committee, and Christophe­r Steele, the former MI6 officer who compiled the famous “dossier” alleging back in mid-2016 that Russia was secretly colluding with the Trump campaign.

Steele may be the ultimate Zelig in this story, a character who keeps reappearin­g at each turn. From what his former colleagues say, he was too good an intelligen­ce operative to be described as a peddler. But his role as a freelance investigat­or, hired by Trump’s opponents, has become a black hole in this story, into which other facts disappear.

The Russia investigat­ion, like these other moments in history, is becoming a version of the “butterfly effect,” where seemingly random, distant events have large consequenc­es — thanks to the pro-Trump echo chamber. It’s Mueller’s job to keep the strands of the central narrative in his hands so that they can be understood and, where necessary, prosecuted.

Trump is running a circus of distractio­n. But at the center of the ring remains Mueller, silent and unblinking.

 ??  ?? David Ignatius
David Ignatius

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States