Chattanooga Times Free Press

Georgia official seeks to replace state’s criticized voting machines

- BY BEN NADLER

ATLANTA — Georgia’s new elections chief asked lawmakers Wednesday for $150 million to replace the state’s outdated electronic voting machines. In doing so, he all but closed the door on a hand-marked paper balloting system that experts say is cheapest and most secure.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensper­ger told Georgia legislator­s meeting for budget hearings that a new voting system is his top priority. Cybersecur­ity experts and voting integrity activists say the touchscree­n machines Georgia has used since 2002 are vulnerable to hacking and can’t be audited effectivel­y because they produce no verifiable paper record.

The current machines and Georgia’s registrati­on practices became the subject of national criticism during last year’s governor’s race between Democrat Stacey Abrams and Republican Brian Kemp. Kemp

served as secretary of state and refused calls to resign from overseeing his own election. He stepped down two days postelecti­on after declaring himself the winner.

Two main systems offered by election equipment vendors have been considered as a replacemen­t. Ballot-marking devices have an electronic touch screen where voters make choices and then print a paper receipt that is read by a scanner. The other system has hand-marked paper ballots that are read by an optical scanner.

Although Raffensper­ger said the procuremen­t process for the new system would not have a “predetermi­ned outcome,” he told lawmakers he believed a system with ballot-marking devices would be faster and more accurate.

“We believe that you get a better result, a more accurate result, and are actually able to move people through the lines faster when you have a ballot-marking device, so you don’t have to cipher out what someone meant with stray marks,” Raffensper­ger said.

The amount requested is also in line with the more costly ballot-marking systems.

Raffensper­ger’s presentati­on followed a study committee’s recommenda­tion earlier this month to use ballot-marking devices over hand-marked paper ballots by a 13-3 vote.

Commission co-chairman Barry Fleming, a Republican state representa­tive from Harlem, previously estimated initial expenditur­es would be roughly $50 million for a hand-marked paper ballot system and about $150 million for a ballot-marking machine system.

The three votes for handmarked paper ballots came from two Democratic lawmakers and the commission’s lone cybersecur­ity expert, Georgia Tech professor Wenke Lee.

Lee explained he favored handmarked paper ballots in an opinion piece published by the Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on last week.

“Paper provides the trail of evidence for post-election audits to determine if software caused an error in election outcomes and does so without re-running an entire election. Paper is human readable and manually countable when needed,” Lee wrote.

The legislatur­e next will have to rewrite election law to specify requiremen­ts for the new machines. Many Democrats have vowed to continue pushing for hand-marked paper ballots.

Then, Raffensper­ger’s office will handle the procuremen­t in line with the change in the law.

Raffensper­ger said that, ideally, the state would have new machines in place in some cities for municipal elections in November 2019, before having them fully online across the state before November 2020.

He said the funding would cover getting the new machines, decommissi­oning the old ones, updating electronic poll books, and training and outreach to county elections officials.

 ?? AP PHOTO/BOB ANDRES ?? Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp greets lawmakers after he addressed the 2019 Season Joint Budget hearings on Wednesday in Atlanta.
AP PHOTO/BOB ANDRES Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp greets lawmakers after he addressed the 2019 Season Joint Budget hearings on Wednesday in Atlanta.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States