Chattanooga Times Free Press

OCASIO-CORTEZ’S POLITICS MATCH THE MOMENT

-

In the wake of his unpreceden­ted campaign and unexpected election, the question always was: What would come after Donald Trump? What were the consequenc­es of electing someone who was inexperien­ced, undeterred by and uninterest­ed in facts and uncannily adept at whipping people into a frenzy by way of mere gesticulat­ions and tweets? Would Trump beget more Trumps?

Or would the pendulum swing violently back in the opposite direction, producing perhaps a return to thoughtful, accountabl­e and intellectu­ally rigorous leadership?

While we await what 2020 will deliver unto 1600 Pennsylvan­ia Ave., we have our short-term answer in Congress, anyway: Alexandria OcasioCort­ez.

In many ways, she is in the making of Trump himself, only plausible because of him, and only justified in comparison to him.

After all, it’s hard to imagine a political system more enamored and less scrutinous of a candidate-turnedpoli­tician as AOC, if Trump hadn’t made acceptable this particular form of politickin­g — one driven by feelings over facts and heavily-reliant on a cult of personalit­y. And that’s just what she’s done, with charisma, charm and impressive success.

Like Trump, she’s been caught repeatedly and unabashedl­y just making stuff up. One example, telling PBS’ “Firing Line” that unemployme­nt was low “because everyone has two jobs.” That’s no less egregious a factual error than when Trump insisted while campaignin­g that he’d “seen” unemployme­nt numbers as high as 42 percent (when the official unemployme­nt rate at the time was 5.1 percent). Both statements were rated “pants on fire” by Politifact.

She’s also been known, like Trump, to cherry-pick informatio­n from partisan sources and extrapolat­e false conclusion­s. Late last year she tweeted a screenshot from an article in the left-leaning Nation magazine, comparing Pentagon spending to the cost of Medicare for All. People immediatel­y pounced on her distortion of the data.

More recently, she mistook a line in a UN Intergover­nmental Panel on Climate Change report from 2018 to say, flatly, “the world is going to end” in 12 years if we don’t stop global warming. Climate scientists say that wasn’t an actual deadline and it’s a misreading of the report.

And, like Trump, she makes wild policy suggestion­s that have little footing in reality. Raising marginal tax rates on the last dollar earned by the wealthiest Americans to 70 percent is red meat for her base but is logistical­ly implausibl­e, much like Trump’s porterhous­e of a suggestion to end birthright citizenshi­p.

But possibly because of Trump, she’s learned that admitting mistakes is an irrelevant — elitist even! — exercise, so instead, she turns that notion on its head, insisting that being “morally right” can be more important than being factually right. It’s not Trump’s institutio­n-underminin­g “fake news” ploy, but a populist wink at the primacy of heart versus head politics.

She’s inarguably taking advantage of a new landscape that Trump helped establish, and for that you can hate the game, but not the player.

One thing that importantl­y separates her from him: her earnestnes­s. No one doubts she has a set of core beliefs and a principled commitment to them, even if her own party finds them impractica­l or politicall­y perilous.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is applying all the tactics of Trump, but with far more charm, likability and mainstream media support. This makes her a very real and significan­t phenomenon. And while it would be easy to dismiss her as naïve, unserious or even flimsy, there’s one thing she’s proven: Her compositio­n is tailor-made for the politics of right now.

 ??  ?? S.E. Cupp
S.E. Cupp

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States