Chattanooga Times Free Press

EPA may ease rules on coal-ash pollution

- BY ELVINA NAWAGUNA CQ-ROLL CALL

WASHINGTON — The Environmen­tal Protection Agency on Monday proposed making it easier for power companies to dispose of toxic residues from burning coal, building on other steps the agency has already taken to rewrite Obama-era rules for coal ash pollution.

The EPA’s actions would unwind some of the requiremen­ts for treating toxic wastewater and ash that coal power plants discharge that were set in that 2015 rule, which implemente­d the first federal limits on the levels of toxic metals that can be discharged in wastewater from power plants, and required companies to use updated technology to prevent such pollution.

Separately, the EPA is working on broader regulation­s to address other parts of the Obama administra­tion rule.

The EPA at the time estimated the 2015 rule would “reduce the amount of toxic metals, nutrients, and other pollutants that steam electric power plants are allowed to discharge by 1.4 billion pounds and reduce water withdrawal by 57 billion gallons.”

However power companies that burn coal, such as AES Corp. of Arlington, Virginia, and utility trade associatio­ns like Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, which represents several power companies, have said the rules were too

stringent and raised their operationa­l costs.

The EPA said Monday the proposed revisions would save coal-burning industries more than $175 million a year.

The agency said it’s making “several planned revisions to provide a clear and stable regulatory framework for coal ash management and disposal” and address issues raised in “litigation, legislatio­n, petitions for reconsider­ation, and rule implementa­tion.”

The changes, the EPA said, would provide “regulatory clarity and flexibilit­y” for companies, but environmen­tal advocates instead accused the administra­tion of putting industry profits ahead of public health.

Coal ash is known to contain several heavy metals and other toxins including arsenic, mercury and cadmium that have been linked to myriad health problems. Some of it is stored in dry form or as wet slurry in ponds. It can also be used as a substitute for soil or as fill material in constructi­on.

“It is outrageous that Trump’s team is so beholden to polluters that they are willing to let power plants continue to dump lead, mercury, chromium and other dangerous chemicals into our water supply to preserve every last cent of their profits,” said Thom Cmar, deputy managing attorney of Earthjusti­ce’s Coal Program.

The EPA has proposed separate rules to lift limitation­s placed by the Obama administra­tion on the amount of coal ash that can be used in certain types of constructi­on. The agency also proposed delaying deadlines for the closure of some unlined coal ash ponds that the Obama administra­tion had asked companies to shut down because they didn’t meet the agency’s safety standards.

Patrick Morrisey, attorney general for West Virginia, which has historical­ly relied heavily on coal for its economy, said the changes will protect coal mining and the livelihood­s of those who depend on the industry.

“The proposed regulation­s will improve the regulatory burden on the coal industry and lower the cost of electricit­y for West Virginians,” he said.

Catastroph­ic coal ash spills in recent years have drawn attention to the dangers of coal ash, the disposal of which was largely unregulate­d for decades.

A coal ash slurry pond at a Tennessee Valley Authority plant in Kingston, Tennessee, overflowed in 2008, releasing 1.1 billion gallons of slurry. The flood of ash leveled homes and covered about a half mile of land, leaving behind $1.2 billion in cleanup costs. That disaster prompted the Obama administra­tion to write the rules it completed in 2015.

In response to the Kingston coal ash spill, TVA is replacing all of its wet coal ash ponds with dry ash disposal methods and plans to spend billions of dollars more to cleanup the residue of its coal ash storage from the 59 coal-fired power plant units it once operated.

TVA Public Relations Manager Scott Gureck said Monday that the utility has already completed the closure of several coal ash ponds and impoundmen­ts and developed detailed schedules to shut down all surface coal ash storage ponds.

“We are reviewing the proposed rule, but don’t anticipate the new proposed August 2020 date will alter our current constructi­on plans,” he said.

In 2014, a Duke Energy plant in North Carolina released millions of liquid ash from a shuttered plant. And last year, Hurricane Florence triggered the closure of another Duke plant — the L.V. Sutton station — after the breach of its coal ash stockpile. Slurry there seeped into the Cape Fear River.

Betsy Southerlan­d, who as director of the EPA’s office of water under the Obama administra­tion helped write the rules, said the agency “documented that coal-fired power plants discharge over 1 billion pounds of pollutants every year into 4,000 miles of rivers, contaminat­ing the drinking water and fisheries of 2.7 million” people.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States