Chattanooga Times Free Press

Barr says he doesn’t envision investigat­ions of Biden, Obama

- BY ERIC TUCKER

WASHINGTON — Attorney General William Barr said Monday that he did not expect an investigat­ion into the origins of the FBI’s Russia investigat­ion to lead to criminal probes of either President Donald Trump’s Democratic opponent, Joe Biden, or former President Barack Obama.

Trump has stated without evidence that he believes Obama committed unspecifie­d crimes as president, repeatedly tweeting, “OBAMAGATE!” The claims have become a rallying cry among Trump supporters. Democrats view it as a desperate attempt to shift the focus from the president’s handling of the coronaviru­s outbreak and nation’s soaring unemployme­nt.

Barr, speaking Monday at an unrelated news conference and responding to a question about Trump’s allegation­s, insisted he would not be swayed by political pressure to investigat­e the president’s opponents.

Barr’s comments come as Democrats and some former law enforcemen­t officials have accused Barr of politicizi­ng decisions and doing Trump’s bidding as attorney general. That criticism was stepped up two weeks ago when the Justice Department moved to dismiss charges against Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI.

“We live in a very divided country right now, and I think that it is critical that we have an election where the American people are allowed to make a decision, a choice, between President Trump and Vice President Biden based on a robust debate of policy issues,” Barr said. “And we cannot allow the process to be hijacked by efforts to drum up criminal investigat­ions of either candidate.”

Barr repeated his belief that the investigat­ion into whether the Trump campaign conspired with

Russia was a miscarriag­e of justice. He has appointed John Durham, the U.S. Attorney from Connecticu­t, to investigat­e whether crimes were committed as intelligen­ce and law enforcemen­t officials examined Russian election interferen­ce.

Barr said Monday that he did not anticipate Durham’s investigat­ion to ensnare Biden or Obama. He pointedly noted that he must approve any criminal investigat­ion of a presidenti­al candidate and that the Supreme Court held just this month that not all abuses of power are criminal in nature.

“Whatever their level of involvemen­t, based on the informatio­n I have today, I don’t expect Mr. Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigat­ion of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern over potential criminalit­y is focused on others.”

He added: This cannot be and will not be a titfor-tat exercise. We are not going to lower the standards just to achieve a result.”

Demands by Trump allies for investigat­ions into Biden and Obama escalated in the last week after the president’s top intelligen­ce official declassifi­ed a list related to the Flynn investigat­ion. The list showed that Biden and other senior officials had asked the National Security Agency to obtain the identity of an American whose interactio­ns with the Russian ambassador had been discovered through surveillan­ce of the diplomat. That American turned out to be Flynn.

Trump supporters have cast the requests, known as unmaskings, as evidence of criminal conduct. But umaskings are a common procedure, done when officials believe that the concealed identity is vital to understand­ing the intelligen­ce report. Thousands of requests are made each year, and Trump’s administra­tion has used the process more frequently than Obama’s did.

 ??  ?? William Barr
William Barr

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States