Chattanooga Times Free Press

GM flips to California’s side in pollution fight with Trump

- BY TOM KRISHER

General Motors is switching sides in the legal fight against California’s right to set its own cleanair standards, abandoning the Trump administra­tion as the president’s term nears its close.

CEO Mary Barra said last week in a letter to environmen­tal groups that GM will no longer support the Trump administra­tion in its defense against a lawsuit over its efforts against California’s standards. And GM is urging other automakers to do the same.

The move is a sign that GM and other automakers are anticipati­ng big changes when President-elect Joe Biden takes office in January. Already at least one other large automaker, Toyota, said it may join GM in switching to California’s team.

In her letter, Barra wrote that the company agrees with Biden’s plan to expand electric vehicle use. Last week, GM said it is testing a new battery chemistry that will bring down electric vehicle costs to those of gas-powered vehicles within five years.

Barra sent the letter after a Monday morning conversati­on with Mary Nichols, head of California’s Air Resources Board, the company said. The board is the state’s air pollution regulator.

“We believe the ambitious electrific­ation goals of the President-elect, California, and General Motors are aligned, to address climate change by drasticall­y reducing automobile emissions,” the letter said.

Nichols called GM’s announceme­nt good news. “I was pleased to be in communicat­ion with Mary Barra again,” she said. “It’s been a while since we had talked.”

Dan Becker of the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the environmen­tal groups Barra wrote to, said GM was wrong in trying to stop California from protecting its people from auto pollution.

“Now the other automakers must follow GM and withdraw support for (President Donald) Trump’s attack on clean cars,” he said in an email.

In a statement, Biden said GM’s decision is encouragin­g for the economy, the planet and success of American auto workers.

“GM’s decision reinforces how shortsight­ed the Trump administra­tion’s efforts to erode American ingenuity and America’s defenses against the climate threat truly are,” the statement said, adding that the ripple effects will help the U.S. innovate and create good-paying union jobs.

Last year General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Toyota and 10 smaller automakers sided with the Trump administra­tion in a lawsuit over whether California has the right to set its own standards for greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy.

The companies said they would intervene in a lawsuit filed by the Environmen­tal Defense Fund against the Trump administra­tion, which has rolled back national pollution and gas mileage standards enacted while Barack Obama was president.

The group called itself the “Coalition for Sustainabl­e Automotive Regulation” and also included Nissan, Hyundai, Kia, Subaru, Isuzu, Suzuki, Maserati, McLaren, Aston-Martin and Ferrari. The coalition said automakers were faced with multiple overlappin­g and inconsiste­nt standards, which would drive up costs for consumers.

In a statement, Toyota said it has supported year-over-year increases in fuel economy standards, and it joined the coalition because most other automakers agreed there should be a single U.S. standard. But the company conceded that Biden soon will take a different position.

“Given the changing circumstan­ces, we are assessing the situation, but remain committed to our goal of a consistent, unitary set of fuel economy standards applicable in all 50 states,” Toyota said.

The initial move put the coalition automakers at odds with five other companies — BMW, Ford, Volkswagen, Volvo and Honda — that backed California and endorsed stricter emissions and fuel economy standards than proposed by the Trump administra­tion. About a dozen other states follow California’s standards.

In September of 2019, Trump announced his administra­tion would seek to revoke California’s congressio­nally granted authority to set standards that are stricter than those issued by federal regulators.

The move came after Ford, BMW, Honda, Volkswagen and later Volvo signed a deal with California, which had been at odds with the Trump administra­tion for months.

Many automakers have said in the past that they support increasing the standards, but not as much as those affirmed in the waning days of the Obama administra­tion in 2016.

Under the Obama requiremen­ts, the fleet of new vehicles would have to average 30 mpg in realworld driving by 2021, rising to 36 mpg in 2025. Those increases would be about 5% per year. The Trump administra­tion’s plan increased fuel economy by 1.5% per year, backing off an earlier proposal to freeze the requiremen­ts at 2021 levels.

Automakers say that because buyers are switching to larger trucks and SUVs, many companies would not be able to meet the stricter standards.

 ?? AP FILE PHOTO/PAUL SANCYA ?? General Motors Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra speaks during the opening of their contract talks with the United Auto Workers in Detroit in 2019.
AP FILE PHOTO/PAUL SANCYA General Motors Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra speaks during the opening of their contract talks with the United Auto Workers in Detroit in 2019.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States