Chattanooga Times Free Press

IS AMERICA A RACIST COUNTRY?

- The New York Times

Last Sunday, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina added himself to the long list of Republican­s who have denied the existence of systemic racism in this country. Graham said on “Fox New Sunday” that “our systems are not racist. America’s not a racist country.”

Graham argued that the country can’t be racist because both Barack Obama and Kamala Harris had been elected and somehow, their overcoming racial hurdles proves the absence of racial hurdles. His view seems to be that the exceptions somehow negated the rule.

In the rebuttal to President Joe Biden’s address to a joint session of Congress, the other senator from South Carolina, Tim Scott, the lone Black Republican in the Senate, parroted Graham. He argued that people are “making money and gaining power by pretending we haven’t made any progress at all, by doubling down on the divisions we’ve worked so hard to heal.”

Scott’s argument seems to leave open the possibilit­y that America may have been a racist country but that it has matured out of it, that it has graduated into egalitaria­nism.

I personally don’t make much of Scott’s ability to reason. There is no world in which recent efforts at enlightenm­ent can be equated to enslavemen­t, lynching and mass incarcerat­ion. None.

It seems to me that the disingenuo­usness on the question of racism is largely a question of language. Is America the people who now inhabit the land, divorced from its systems and its history? Or, is the meaning of America inclusive of those systems and history?

When people say that America is a racist country, they don’t necessaril­y mean that all or even most Americans are consciousl­y racist. However, it is important to remember that nearly half the country just voted for a fullon racist in Donald Trump, and they did so by either denying his racism, becoming apologists for it, or applauding it. What do you call a country thus composed?

Historical­ly, however, there is no question that the country was founded by racists and white supremacis­ts, and that much of the early wealth of this country was built on the backs of enslaved Africans, and much of the early expansion came at the expense of the massacre of the land’s Indigenous people and broken treaties with them.

Eight of the first 10 presidents personally enslaved Africans.

Abraham Lincoln said during his famous debates against Stephen A. Douglas in 1858 that among white people and Black ones “there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of the superior position being assigned to the white man.”

The country went on to fight a Civil War over whether some states could maintain slavery as they wished.

Some will concede the historical point and insist on the progress point, arguing that was then and this is now, that racism simply doesn’t exist now as it did then. I would agree. American racism has evolved and became less blunt, but it has not become less effective. The knife has simply been sharpened. Now systems do the work that once required the overt actions of masses of individual racists.

So, what does it mean for a system to be racist? Does the appellatio­n depend on the system in question being openly, explicitly racist from top to bottom, or simply that there is some degree of measurable bias embedded in those systems? I assert the latter.

America is not the same country it was, but neither is it the country it purports to be. On some level this is a tension between American idealism and American realism, between an aspiration and a current condition.

And the precise way we phrase the statement makes all the difference: America’s systems — like its criminal justice, education and medical systems — have a pro-white/anti-black bias, and an extraordin­ary portion of America denies or defends those biases.

As Mark Twain once put it: “The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter. ‘Tis the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.”

Being imprecise or undecided with our language on this subject contribute­s to the murkiness.

Saying that America is racist is not a radical statement. If that requires a longer explanatio­n or definition, so be it. The fact, in the end, is not altered.

 ??  ?? Charles Blow
Charles Blow
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States