Chattanooga Times Free Press

REPUBLICAN­S UNDERSTAND POWER. DEMOCRATS DO NOT.

-

Democrats look like they’re the ones with the greater share of political power in America today, holding both the White House and Congress. So why do they so often seem weak and ineffectua­l, while Republican­s ruthlessly employ every shred of power they have?

You could hardly have asked for a more vivid illustrati­on than what’s happening right now. In Congress, a couple of key Democrats, especially Sen. Joe Manchin III, D-W.Va., proclaim their intention to sabotage the party’s agenda if it isn’t drasticall­y pared back, lest anyone think it’s too “partisan.”

Meanwhile, Republican-run states are rushing to create a far-right dystopia where every customer at your local supermarke­t is packing heat, school boards and election boards are run by QAnon lunatics, mob rule is valorized and institutio­nalized, voting rights are dramatical­ly restricted, and abortion is outlawed.

And they’re doing it with the help of a conservati­ve Supreme Court majority that barely bothers to pretend that it cares about precedent, the Constituti­on, the law, or anything other than remaking America to conform to its ideologica­l agenda.

We’re seeing what a profound difference there is in how Democrats and Republican­s view power. When Democrats have it they’re often apologetic, uncertain, hesitant to use it any way that anyone might object to. Republican­s, on the other hand, will squeeze it and stretch it as far as they can. They aren’t reluctant and they aren’t afraid of a backlash. Whatever they can do, they will do.

Think of how the two parties react when presented with an obstacle to getting what they want. Democrats often issue statements of regret: We’d like to move forward, but what can we do? This is how democracy works.

Republican­s, on the other hand, react to obstacles by getting creative. They search for loopholes, they engineer procedural workaround­s, they devise innovative ways to seize and wield control. When they come up with an idea and someone says “That’s madness — no one has ever dared try something like that before,” they know they’re on the right track.

There’s a line of jurisprude­nce establishi­ng the right to abortion? What if we outlaw the procedure, but pull a switcheroo by putting enforcemen­t in the hands of millions of potential vigilantes so you can’t sue the government to overturn the law? Does that sound cynical and crazy? Don’t worry, we’ve got five votes on the Supreme Court who’ll give it the rubber stamp.

That’s the kind of creative use of power Democrats don’t even contemplat­e. Think back to the decision that led directly to this latest stage in the assault on abortion, when thenSenate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., refused to allow Barack Obama’s nominee to be considered for a Supreme Court vacancy, holding it open for nearly a year so it could be filled by a Republican president.

McConnell didn’t worry about how many stern editorials condemned his action. He didn’t care about whether polls showed that if you asked them the right way the public would disagree with what he was doing, because he knew that they were barely paying attention.

Critically, nearly all of his Republican Senate colleagues got on board with the strategy. They didn’t care that what they were doing wouldn’t be seen as sufficient­ly “bipartisan.” They wanted that seat, and they were going to get it. Now they have it — and two more, thanks to the fact that Donald Trump was elected in 2016 winning a minority of the vote — and they’re damn sure going to use it.

You can trace the roots of these differing conception­s of power very far back, but the most critical moment was the 2000 election controvers­y in Florida, not only for the tactical chasm that separated the parties throughout that battle, but for the way it ended. Five conservati­ves on the Supreme Court simply handed George W. Bush the presidency, not because it was what the Constituti­on demanded or even because there was a remotely persuasive legal argument for it, but because the outcome itself was what they wanted.

They could do it, so they did. Republican­s learned a vital lesson: If you have the power to get what you want, use it. Don’t worry that you’ll pay some karmic price down the road, because you probably won’t.

Perhaps most importantl­y, when they muster all the creativity and ruthlessne­ss they can find to deploy their power, they have a long-term vision, one unconstrai­ned by the granular politics of the moment. Will their party take a political hit for Roe v. Wade being overturned? Almost certainly. But it’s a trade they’re willing to take, because they so desperatel­y want women to be stopped from accessing abortions.

They do not quake at the prospect of the electorate’s displeasur­e, especially when they’ve done so much to ensure that the will of the electorate can be thwarted with the right combinatio­n of gerrymande­ring and voter suppressio­n. They know what they want, and they’ll do what’s necessary to get it.

And Democrats? They fret and worry, they restrain themselves, they recommit to norms the other side has already trashed, they live in fear of political repercussi­ons that never come. And their own goals languish while Republican­s turn America into a darker, meaner, crueller place.

 ??  ?? Paul Waldman
Paul Waldman

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States