Chattanooga Times Free Press

PRO-CHOICE FORCES MUST PERSIST TO 2024

- St. Louis Post-Dispatch

In the first nationwide test of public sentiments since the Supreme Court last summer ended abortion rights in America, voters got to have their say. So far, their verdict has been resounding: Voters in almost a half-dozen states cast their ballots Nov. 8 for measures to protect the biological self-determinat­ion of women — and nowhere did voters turn back those rights. Exit polls indicated it was the second-most important overall subject motivating voters and by far the most important one motivating people to vote Democratic.

Pro-choice forces must heed the clear message here and make sure the topic remains front and center throughout the lead-up to 2024.

The court’s ruling overturnin­g Roe v. Wade this year was heavily influenced by the personal preference­s of five conservati­ve justices, who chose to disregard a half-century of court precedent. Privacy rights implicit in the Constituti­on were held less important than states’ rights. They also disregarde­d the views of a strong majority of Americans who support abortion rights with reasonable restrictio­ns.

By removing Roe’s nationwide guarantee of abortion rights within the first trimester, the court effectivel­y threw the issue back to the states. Red state government­s in Missouri and elsewhere responded by quickly gutting abortion rights in their laws. Kansas lawmakers wanted to join the anti-choice stampede, but the state’s courts had already ruled that the Kansas Constituti­on protected abortion rights. So Republican­s pushed a referendum on last August’s ballot to amend the state constituti­on — only to see their normally conservati­ve voters overwhelmi­ngly defeat it.

It’s now clear that outcome was no fluke. Five additional states on Tuesday had measures on their ballots either bolstering or undercutti­ng abortion rights. And in every case, voters sided with women’s ability to control their own bodies, including in the red states of Kentucky and Montana and the swing state of Michigan.

Kentucky’s measure would have explicitly establishe­d that the state’s constituti­on doesn’t protect abortion rights, while Montana’s measure sought to confront the specter of “born-alive” abortions — which in the real world virtually never happen but which anti-abortion activists have used to gin up emotion on the topic. Both measures failed. Voters in Michigan, California and Vermont all enshrined abortion rights in their state constituti­ons.

Missouri voters aren’t nearly as radically right as their elected legislator­s, as evidenced by voter-approved referendum­s on Medicaid expansion, labor rights, the minimum wage and, last week, legalized recreation­al marijuana sales and use. The once-unthinkabl­e idea of putting abortion rights on the ballot in Missouri is perhaps something pro-choice activists here should be looking at.

Nationally, Democrats should take Nov. 8’s results as evidence that abortion rights are indeed a politicall­y potent topic that should be highlighte­d at every turn. As congressio­nal Republican­s whisper about a federal abortion, Democrats should be talking more loudly about bolstering abortion rights nationally — which can only happen if they win in 2024.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States