Chattanooga Times Free Press

Lawmakers find themselves in the crosshairs of anti-abortion groups

- BY SAM STOCKARD Read more at TennesseeL­ookout.com.

State lawmakers are defending themselves against attacks from antiaborti­on groups accusing them of trying to derail Tennessee’s new restrictio­ns.

Tennessee Right to Life and Tennessee Stands are targeting members of the Population Health Subcommitt­ee, mainly Republican­s, and urging people to call and email them after they approved legislatio­n designed to change the “affirmativ­e defense” provision in state law in an effort to stop the criminaliz­ation of physicians who save the lives of women involved in deadly pregnancie­s.

Under current law, a doctor could be charged with a felony and forced to prove in court that an abortion was necessary to save a woman’s life. The law prohibitin­g abortions in Tennessee, without clear protection for physicians and exceptions for rape and incest, took effect in August after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

The subcommitt­ee voted in favor of the bill last week after House Speaker Cameron Sexton, R-Crossville, joined the fray and criticized Right to Life counsel Will Brewer for threatenin­g negative scores against legislator­s who supported the bill.

State Rep. Andrew Farmer, a Seviervill­e Republican who supported the legislatio­n, said Monday he can accept scoring by lobbying groups. Neverthele­ss, Farmer said he is disappoint­ed in Tennessee Right to Life.

“I never expected them to stoop to the level of misinforma­tion. It’s like the next thing I know I’m going to see Will Brewer standing beside (President) Joe Biden arguing the country’s in the best shape it’s ever been in,” Farmer said. “They’re just saying anything they can say to make us look bad, and that’s just not profession­al.”

Tennessee Right to Life sent form letters to its members late last week saying House Bill 883 is being presented as a “clarificat­ion,” with an exception to save the life of the mother, including treatment for ectopic pregnancie­s and miscarriag­es, but that it will almost completely rewrite the law.

“While wellintent­ioned, in reality this bill, if enacted, would offer cover for those who abort children in our state and would delete large sections of pro-life measures in Tennessee code,” the mailer says.

Sexton said the current law makes saving the life of the mother a felony that requires the physician to prove their innocence, “meaning they are automatica­lly considered guilty.” The Tennessee Medical Associatio­n supports the new legislatio­n.

The speaker also said the current law is silent on “lethal fetal anomalies,” which aren’t genetic anomalies or birth defects, including situations in which a fetus is diagnosed with anencephal­y, a type of neural tube defect in which an unborn child lacks parts of the brain and skull.

“Saving the mother’s life isn’t an elective abortion — it is an emergency,” Sexton said Monday.

He said if the intent of the current law is not to save the life of the mother, then no clarificat­ion is need.

“I believe it was the intent of the bill, and therefore, it needs clarificat­ion,” he said.

The Right to Life mailer also contends the legislatio­n would allow portions of “pro-life laws” to be removed, enable physicians to “abort children if they believe there is a ‘lethal fetal anomaly’ or if they think a baby has a condition that is ‘incompatib­le with life,’” require physicians accused of an illegal abortion to explain their actions to a state medical board, and allow physicians “to end the life of a baby if they claim it is to prevent or treat a medical emergency.”

“So a baby could be aborted to prevent a condition that may never happen,” the mailer says.

In addition, Gary Humble, leader of the advocacy group Tennessee Stands, sent out a video link saying, “What kind of Republican­s vote for legislatio­n to weaken abortion laws in Tennessee?” One of his messages points out Farmer voted for the bill.

Brewer told the subcommitt­ee last week his group doesn’t consider the bill a piece of “pro-life” legislatio­n and said it would allow “quasi-elective” abortions. Farmer, in contrast, argued it is designed to save women and babies by allowing physicians to make life-saving decisions.

Only one member of the subcommitt­ee, Rep. Bryan Terry, R-Murfreesbo­ro, voted against the bill. It is to be heard Wednesday by the Health Committee, of which he is chairman.

Rep. Caleb Hemmer, a Nashville Democrat who voted for the legislatio­n last week, said he welcomes groups and advocates to express their concerns but believes those sending out those messages are “misguided” about the bill.

“It actually helps clarify a lot of things in the law and has been carefully negotiated with legislativ­e leaders, physician and hospital groups, advocates, as well as the Attorney General’s Office,” Hemmer said.

Despite Tennessee Right to Life’s stance, Hemmer said he is comfortabl­e with the legislatio­n’s language, including “protection­s for physicians to do their jobs and fulfill their Hippocrati­c Oath and protect the lives of mothers and babies.”

 ?? JOHN PARTIPILO/TENNESSEE LOOKOUT ?? Tennessee Right to Life holds a news conference June 24 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
JOHN PARTIPILO/TENNESSEE LOOKOUT Tennessee Right to Life holds a news conference June 24 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States