Chattanooga Times Free Press

GOP Senate bill may ease voter challenges, conflict federal law

- BY STANLEY DUNLAP GEORGIA RECORDER Read more at GeorgiaRec­order.com.

A contingent of Georgia Republican lawmakers is pursuing election legislatio­n relitigati­ng 2021’s sweeping voting law overhaul that was spurred by claims that former President Donald Trump lost Georgia’s 2020 election due to fraudulent absentee ballots and voters casting illegal ballots.

Senate Bill 221 advanced through a Senate Ethics Committee on Tuesday night after a flurry of amendments and doubts were raised about whether it could pass legal muster. The 20-page bill would ban counties from offering absentee drop boxes, expand the opportunit­y for mass challenges of voter eligibilit­y and spell out more security measures for ballots.

The legislatio­n, sponsored by Ethics Committee Chairman and Sylvania Republican Max Burns, cleared the committee hurdle ahead of Monday’s Crossover Day, the deadline for bills to move from one of the legislativ­e chambers to create a clear path for approval this year.

Voting and civil rights organizati­ons Fair Fight Action, ACLU of Georgia, Common Cause Georgia and Progress GA said provisions in the measure would lower the bar to remove a voter from a county’s rolls and unfairly target election workers.

The bill would allow for a voter’s eligibilit­y to be primarily challenged based on informatio­n found in a National Change of Address database that election experts Tuesday labeled as unreliable.

The voting rights coalition said it is particular­ly worrisome that the legislatio­n undermines the rights of voters and further emboldens the frivolous and largely rejected past challenges to voters’ eligibilit­y.

Esosa Osa, deputy executive director for Fair Fight Action, said this year’s bill is a continuati­on of the Republican­backed sweeping election law overhaul Senate Bill 202 passed just months after the 2020 presidenti­al election.

“Georgia Republican­s, who touted the effectiven­ess of elections last year and even pushed to limit challenges, have capitulate­d to extremists and renewed attacks on our democracy by giving unpreceden­ted power to conspiracy theorists one day after data came out that exposed the discrimina­tory impact of their baseless voter challenges,” Osa said in a statement.

The bill provides that a voter can be disqualifi­ed through address databases published by the U.S. Postal Service backed with at least one other factor, which could range from insurance changes to a person providing “reasonably reliable evidence” in a sworn statement.

State election Director Blake Evans was among the witnesses who testified at Tuesday’s committee meeting about concerns that the bill could run afoul of a federal voter registrati­on act by not going through the proper channels to confirm where a voter lives and that the change of address database is unreliable.

Mass voter challenges became more common following the 2020 presidenti­al election as the right-wing voter watchdog group True the Vote teamed up with the Georgia Republican Party on a campaign to cast doubt on the eligibilit­y of hundreds of thousands of Georgia voters.

The new legislatio­n aims to clarify areas that have been questioned in order to ensure that all 159 counties comply with Georgia law, Burns said at this week’s committee meeting.

“You’ll notice that we dealt a lot with ballot security, a lot with ballot access, digital ballot access, and we dealt with voter challenges,” he said. “If you have not changed your permanent residency, the fact that your name appears on the change of address registry is not sufficient grounds to be challenged.”

The types of election workers allowed to enter a secure room where ballots are stored is spelled out, as well as a chain of custody protocol that requires blank ballots to be placed in sealed containers and two people to sign a transfer form when the ballots are transporte­d between voting precincts.

Prosecutor­s could not be held liable for misconduct if they make a good faith effort to investigat­e allegation­s of violations of election laws, under Burns’ proposal.

The bill also includes a requiremen­t that poll workers must be U.S. citizens and “judicious, intelligen­t and upright.”

Tiffany Muller, president of End Citizens United/Let America Vote Action Fund, urged Georgia lawmakers to reject Burns’ election legislatio­n.

“From lowering evidentiar­y standards for challengin­g election results, to outlawing the use of drop boxes, to empowering conspiracy theorists, SB 221 is a downright assault on the freedom to vote in Georgia,” she said in a statement. “The Republican­s aren’t even being coy that this bill is in direct response to the fact that more and more people of color are casting their votes and making their voices heard. Instead of winning elections on merit and ideas, they’re attempting to maintain their grip on power by changing the rules.”

Several other election-related bills have been introduced during this session, including two local GOP-sponsored bills that organizati­ons like Black Voters Matter claim are a coordinate­d effort to reduce the number of Black school board members on election boards in Ware County and Macon-Bibb County.

In House Bill 422 and Senate Bill 227, election board members would be appointed by the Ware and Macon-Bibb county commission­s rather than by the main political parties and election board chairs.

 ?? AP PHOTO BY JEFF AMY ?? Georgia Senate Ethics Committee Chairman Max Burns, R-Sylvania, speaking Monday at the state Capitol in Atlanta, explains a bill that would ban private contributi­ons to counties for elections.
AP PHOTO BY JEFF AMY Georgia Senate Ethics Committee Chairman Max Burns, R-Sylvania, speaking Monday at the state Capitol in Atlanta, explains a bill that would ban private contributi­ons to counties for elections.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States