Chattanooga Times Free Press

Regulators say company was too lax about safety

- BY JOSH FUNK

Norfolk Southern made improvemen­ts after one of its trains derailed, caught fire and spilled toxic chemicals near an Ohio town, but the company is nowhere near the “gold standard for safety” it is striving to be, according to federal regulators. Instead, the railroad is too often only willing to meet minimum safety requiremen­ts.

The Federal Railroad Administra­tion released its 143-page report on the Atlantabas­ed railroad’s safety culture Wednesday. The agency has been working on the report for months since thousands of people had to evacuate their homes after the East Palestine, Ohio, derailment.

Poor communicat­ion and mistrust between employees and managers are hindering Norfolk Southern’s efforts to improve safety, the report also said. The agency questioned whether the company’s training for employees and managers is adequate.

“At a time when so many people working on and living near train tracks are asking legitimate questions about how major freight railroads operate, railroads must have a culture and operations that are focused on safety,” agency administra­tor Amit Bose said. “This first-of-its-kind assessment — conducted immediatel­y after the Norfolk Southern derailment in East Palestine — shows in too many instances the railroad should be doing more to ensure the safety people deserve.”

The company is collaborat­ing with workers on safety and addressing the report’s findings, said Norfolk Southern CEO Alan Shaw, who since the Feb. 3 derailment near Pennsylvan­ia has repeatedly called for his railroad to set the “gold standard” for safety in the industry.

Bose met with Shaw and several of the railroad’s other executives Tuesday to go over the findings, and the company gave a copy of the report to Atkins Nuclear Secured, an independen­t consultant with expertise in nuclear submarines that is reviewing the company’s safety program.

“We aren’t waiting” to act, Shaw said. He said the railroad will keep working on improvemen­ts it announced in March while trying to address the regulators’ recommenda­tions.

“Unless agencies step in and force the carriers to do these things, they won’t do them because there’s a cost associated with it.”

— TONY CARDWELL, PRESIDENT, BROTHERHOO­D OF MAINTENANC­E OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION UNION

Congress and regulators have called for all the major freight railroads to make a number of changes to improve safety but proposed legislatio­n has stalled in the Senate and failed to get started in the Republican­controlled House.

The rail agency said its assessment “shows numerous examples where NS seems more concerned with compliance with minimum safety requiremen­ts of federal regulation­s and industry standards rather than understand­ing and seeking to address safety concerns that fall outside the boundaries of existing rules and regulation­s.”

And as investigat­ors looked into the railroad’s practices, they “encountere­d multiple instances of lapses in trust between employees and their frontline supervisor­s,” including times when employees refused to meet with investigat­ors because they feared they would be discipline­d for speaking out about their safety concerns.

Shaw has defended the railroad’s overall safety record and said its number of derailment­s is down since it began overhaulin­g its operations in 2019 and making widespread job cuts in the name of efficiency. But the federal agency pointed out that between 2018 and 2022 the rate of accidents per million train miles on Norfolk Southern rose faster than any other major freight railroad.

The agency said it has noticed some initial improvemen­t since the derailment, but that it has been inconsiste­nt as the railroad hasn’t always communicat­ed the changes well to all its supervisor­s and employees.

Just last year the agency audited Norfolk Southern’s safety practices and training programs after three railroad employees — including two conductors who had been on the job less than a year — suffered amputation­s while on duty. The agency made 25 recommenda­tions in that audit that the railroad didn’t promptly or comprehens­ively respond to.

Just two days before the East Palestine derailment, “NS responded, indicating that where recommenda­tions exceeded the minimum regulatory requiremen­ts, they would take no further action, but did promise to engage in corrective action for the majority of the recommenda­tions,” the report said.

The National Transporta­tion Safety Board has been investigat­ing what caused the Ohio derailment after holding hearings on it in June. But that agency has said the derailment was likely caused by an overheatin­g bearing on one of the rail cars. A sensor triggered an alarm about that bearing but the crew didn’t have time to stop the train before cars loaded with hazardous chemicals began to careen off the tracks.

The federal rail agency took a close look at how Norfolk Southern monitors those sensors and found that there was often only one employee — sometimes working from home — monitoring all the roughly 1,200 detectors throughout the railroad’s network of 19,500 miles of track in the eastern United States. And that person relied on email to alert dispatcher­s about any problems — creating the possibilit­y of a delay in notice. That person also dealt with reports of mechanical problems from train crews and safety concerns reported by the public.

In addition to Wednesday’s report, the Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion said it had fined the railroad $49,111 for failing to provide proper protective gear and hazardous materials training to the workers who were sent to East Palestine immediatel­y after the derailment to rebuild the tracks.

Norfolk Southern also agreed establish a medical monitoring program to track the health of workers who were at the site and improve its training for future derailment­s as part of a settlement with OSHA.

Tony Cardwell, who leads the union representi­ng track maintenanc­e workers, said he’s glad to see OSHA doing something to hold the railroad accountabl­e because its “actions were completely derelict.” Cardwell said he was “blown away” when he learned that his members were working at the derailment site just in their normal leather gloves and boots and not in the hazmat suits he kept seeing on news reports.

“Unless agencies step in and force the carriers to do these things, they won’t do them because there’s a cost associated with it,” said Cardwell, who is president of the Brotherhoo­d of Maintenanc­e of Way Employes Division union.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States