Chattanooga Times Free Press

Supreme Court asked to deny limits on abortion drug

- BY MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is being asked to reverse an appellate ruling that would cut off mail-order access to a drug used in the most common method of abortion in the United States.

The case would be the first major abortion dispute decided by the Supreme Court since it overturned Roe v. Wade last year. That ruling has led to bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy in 15 states, with some exceptions, and once cardiac activity can be detected, which is around six weeks, in two others.

In appeals filed Friday, the Biden administra­tion and New York-based Danco Laboratori­es, the manufactur­er of mifepristo­ne, argued that federal judges should not secondgues­s the Food and Drug Administra­tion’s approval of the drug or the conditions under which it is dispensed.

A federal appeals court ruling in August would revoke approval for sending the drug through the mail and would shorten, from the current 10 weeks to seven weeks, the time during which mifepristo­ne can be used in pregnancy.

The justices previously intervened in the case in April to assure the availabili­ty of mifepristo­ne while a challenge proceeds in the federal courts. The Supreme Court is widely expected to agree to hear the case and have the final word, probably by early summer 2024 and in the middle of presidenti­al and congressio­nal campaigns.

In urging the justices to reverse the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, lawyers for Danco wrote, “For the women and teenage girls, health care providers, and States that depend on FDA’s actions to ensure safe and effective reproducti­ve health care is available, this case matters tremendous­ly.”

The Justice Department said the appeals court ignored a scientific judgment about mifepristo­ne’s safety and effectivne­ss since its approval in 2000.

“To the government’s knowledge, the decisions below mark the first time any court has restricted access to an FDA-approved drug based on disagreeme­nt with FDA’s expert judgment about the conditions required to assure that drug’s safe use — much less done so after those conditions had been in effect for years,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, the administra­tion’s top Supreme Court lawyer, wrote.

Abortion opponents filed their challenge to mifepristo­ne in November and initially won a sweeping ruling in April revoking the drug’s approval entirely. The appeals court left intact the FDA’s initial approval of mifepristo­ne. But it would reverse changes regulators made in 2016 and 2021 that eased some conditions for administer­ing the drug.

 ?? AP FILE PHOTO/PATRICK SEMANSKY ?? Light illuminate­s part of the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington.
AP FILE PHOTO/PATRICK SEMANSKY Light illuminate­s part of the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States