Chattanooga Times Free Press

TRUMP PROMISES POWER GRABS, IF HE WINS IN 2024. HERE’S THE PLAN

- Jackie Calmes

In the wake of last week’s terrifying news of The New York Times/Siena College polls showing Donald Trump beating President Joe Biden in must-win battlegrou­nd states, keep in mind two words and spread them: Insurrecti­on Act.

It’s been 31 years since a president last invoked the act and dispatched troops domestical­ly to enforce federal law. That’s the longest stretch of nonuse in the Insurrecti­on Act’s roughly 240-year history, befitting the disquietin­g power it confers. Back then, President George H.W. Bush sent the military, at the request of California Gov. Pete Wilson, to quell the 1992 riots in Los Angeles after four police officers were acquitted for their horrific, video-recorded beating of Rodney King.

But if Trump is re-elected, the law’s next invocation could well come soon, on Jan. 20, 2025 — Inaugurati­on Day. You’ve been warned. Anticipati­ng widespread protests against his second term, Trump and allies reportedly are drafting plans to invoke the Insurrecti­on Act in his first hours back in the White House — thereby confirming the expected protesters’ likely point: Trump is a danger to liberty and constituti­onal governance.

And that’s just one of many MAGA plans in the works, all aimed at making good on Trump’s central promise of the 2024 campaign: “retributio­n. ” (A third word to remember, and repeat.)

According to the Washington Post, Trump allies — purported intellectu­als and Cabinet wannabes in far-right think tanks — are “mapping out specific plans for using the federal government to punish [his] critics and opponents,” even naming individual­s to be investigat­ed and prosecuted. For what, you ask. TBD.

The Post account builds on an earlier one in The New York Times about the “Project 2025” plan for a new Trump administra­tion — er, autocracy. The newspaper’s report said Trump’s second-term objectives include taking control of independen­t agencies, including the Fed, that are meant to be free of political interferen­ce; impounding congressio­nally appropriat­ed funds he doesn’t like; gutting the civil service and returning to the partisan 19th century “spoils system”; and purging the Defense, State and intelligen­ce department­s of disloyal officials — disloyal to Trump, that is.

Nearly half of the electorate supports this would-be despot, polls show, including a CNN poll released Tuesday. More voters think Biden is the mentally suspect codger of the two. But an unpreceden­ted number of former presidenti­al appointees attest that it’s Trump — “He has a very fragile ego. … Something happened to him as a kid,” William Barr theorized recently. They all but implore us to never let their former boss darken the door of the Oval Office again.

We’re talking about former Pentagon and intelligen­ce chiefs, other Cabinet secretarie­s, members of his White House inner circle — even his vice president. As I said, it’s unpreceden­ted. Not even Richard Nixon, post-resignatio­n, invited such opprobrium from former acolytes.

Despite this, too many voters are disengaged, grumpy that their choice seems to be coming down to Trump vs. Biden. As if those choices were comparably distastefu­l when, in fact, one is vanilla and the other is nitroglyce­rin.

Trump, returned to the presidency, would sit at the apex of a government whose foundation is the rule of law. Yet his obnoxious outbursts last week in his New York civil trial over financial skuldugger­y were just the latest evidence of his disdain for the law and the judicial system. And we haven’t even gotten to his three criminal trials for seeking to overturn Biden’s election and making off with government documents. No one — not witnesses, prosecutor­s or judges — is immune from his attacks and the death threats that follow.

Then there’s the flip side of Trump’s promises of revenge: the rewards and pardons he’ll dispense to convicted

Jan. 6 rioters and schemers, cronies in legal peril and, of course, himself. He’ll try, if there’s a next time, to make good on his past claim that under the Constituti­on’s Article 2, “I have the right to do whatever I want as president.”

Fact check: He doesn’t.

As president, Trump was thwarted in his unhinged, unconstitu­tional and unethical impulses by those former administra­tion officials he now assails.

The folks at Project 2025 are compiling names of thousands of potential appointees for a second Trump administra­tion who are sure to be “conservati­ve warriors.”

So what guardrails might protect us from Trump 2.0? There is the military, which can refuse an illegal order. The Insurrecti­on Act, however, gives a president broad authority to order the military into action in this country; the Supreme Court in 1827 said the power to use troops domestical­ly “belongs exclusivel­y to the President, and … his decision is conclusive upon all other persons.”

There are the federal courts, which mostly served the republic well against Trump’s postelecti­on scheming. There’s the Senate, given its power to confirm presidenti­al appointees, though that’s a thin reed indeed given Republican­s’ fealty to Trump. The best guardrail is not electing Trump, period. Repeat: Insurrecti­on Act. Retributio­n. Because he’s warned us.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States