Chattanooga Times Free Press

INCLUDE PALESTINIA­NS IN POST-WAR GAZA PEACE FORCE

-

As New Year’s Day approaches in a blood-soaked Gaza, the Biden administra­tion must prod Israel to face a reality: There is no endgame for this war that doesn’t require a Palestinia­n security force to help maintain order in Gaza after Hamas is deposed.

Where will this postHamas Palestinia­n force come from? The obvious answer is that it should be drawn from the thousands of Palestinia­ns who serve in the roughly half-dozen security organizati­ons now under the nominal control of the Palestinia­n Authority.

The authority is incompeten­t and corrupt — so this is hardly an ideal option. Israel rightly faults the authority for doing a poor job in maintainin­g law and order in the West Bank. But the authority, for all its faults, provides the best bridge to a postwar internatio­nal peacekeepi­ng force for Gaza, with Arab support. The authority has supporters in Gaza who despise Hamas. But they need help — not more bombs.

This challenge — of empowering and training security forces drawn from the Palestinia­n Authority — is one that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu keeps resisting. But Biden administra­tion officials see no other good pathway forward; they’re urging Israel to address the challenge before the carnage in Gaza gets worse and the future power vacuum there becomes impossible for anyone to fill.

The reality is that the future of Palestinia­n security in Gaza begins with improved Palestinia­n security forces in the West Bank. That’s where such forces, independen­t of Hamas, can learn how to protect Palestinia­ns, even as they cooperate with Israel, the United States and moderate Arab government­s.

The multiple security services illustrate the jumble of responsibi­lity within the authority. Some units, such as the Presidenti­al Guard and parts of the General Intelligen­ce Service, have been well-trained by the CIA and Jordanian military and intelligen­ce. The problem is that their writ has been too narrow, with authority limited mostly to what’s called “Area A” of the West Bank, which includes the big cities of Hebron, Ramallah, Nablus and Jenin, but accounts for only 18% of the overall territory.

To develop the leadership and skills they will need in Gaza — and the West Bank — the security forces need a wider footprint. The State Department explicitly calls for them to move into “areas vacated by [the Israel Defense Forces], including Area B,” which connects the West Bank’s big cities and accounts for another 22% of the West Bank.

Biden administra­tion officials understand the need for such an expansion. But they’ve been wary of pressing a beleaguere­d Israel. They should push harder.

Time is running out. Unless the authority can operate across a wider swath of the West Bank and begin training for a future role in Gaza, it won’t have the confidence of Palestinia­ns or the competence to be a strong partner for Israel.

Israel’s path out of Gaza also requires a crackdown on violence by extremist settlers in the West Bank. The Biden administra­tion should recognize that senior IDF commanders oppose violence committed by extremist settlers and the harassment of the authority’s fragile security forces because they make it harder to maintain order in the West Bank — and, eventually, to create a stable post-Hamas order in Gaza in which Palestinia­n rights and security will be respected. The IDF doesn’t want an endless war.

Netanyahu’s relentless campaign against Hamas has shattered Gaza. He seems to have no idea how to put the pieces back together — or even to care what happens to the Palestinia­ns there. The United States has a plan for the day after, even if Netanyahu doesn’t. He should start listening — or face the likelihood that he will soon be replaced.

 ?? ?? David Ignatius
David Ignatius

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States