Chattanooga Times Free Press

TRUMP CAN’T FIND ANYONE TO SPOT HIM $464M

-

Of course no one will lend Donald Trump the half-billion dollars he needs to put up while appealing his fraud case. Would you?

In recent months, the former president has racked up a series of costly legal judgments for his many misdeeds.

In the most expensive case, Trump was found liable for lying about the value of his real estate assets so he could get better terms on loans and insurance. In that judgment, he owes $464 million, after interest. He’s appealing the case, which was brought by the New York attorney general. In the meantime, a judge has said Trump must put up cash or bond to prove he’s good for the money and isn’t appealing merely to delay payment for a while.

Despite boasting about his deep pockets — and even saying in a deposition last year that he had “substantia­lly in excess of $400 million in cash” — Trump has struggled to come up with the dough. So, he tried to get out of it. First, his lawyers asked to instead post a $100 million bond. After all, Trump treats every bill he receives as merely an opening offer — even when it’s a court ruling.

The judge said no.

Then, on Monday, his lawyers came back and complained that no one would agree to post a bond on his behalf. The company hired to help secure a bond package said it had reached out to “virtually every major surety in the market” and spent “countless hours negotiatin­g with one of the largest insurance companies in the world.” The lawyers said a key challenge was that Trump wanted to use his real estate as collateral for the bond, and none of the major surety companies would accept it.

Got that? Trump owes this money because he fraudulent­ly misreprese­nted the value of his assets, and now apparently no one will accept those assets as collateral. Oops.

Imagine you sold someone a glass engagement ring that you claimed was a real diamond. Then, when a judge found you liable for fraud, you tried to use the “diamond ring” as collateral for an appeal bond. That’s the level of chutzpah we’re working with here.

There are other reasons companies might not want to accept his real estate as collateral, including that the properties might be heavily encumbered by debt already, which would mean that the bond issuer would be second, third or fourth in line in the case of a foreclosur­e.

Also, to be clear, the problem isn’t merely that no single surety will put up the full half-billion dollars. Trump could ask different insurers to lend a fraction of that and each take on a portion of the risk. According to a sworn statement the lawyers submitted, sureties won’t do that, either.

Even if there were no problem whatsoever with Trump’s collateral, skittishne­ss about lending to Trump is more than reasonable. Trump has an extensive history of not paying his bills, whether to cabinet-builders hired by his casinos or big banks financing his skyscraper­s. In fact, he often brags about not paying his bills.

Additional­ly, imagine you loan Trump a few million dollars, and then he gets elected president again. It would become virtually impossible to collect. If you did try to collect, Trump would likely have few qualms about siccing the Justice or Treasury department­s on you.

How do we know? Because he did exactly this the last time he was president. He weaponized the powers of state for much smaller infraction­s. His former chief of staff, John Kelly, also said in a sworn statement that Trump tried to order the Internal Revenue Service to investigat­e his perceived enemies.

That’s the funny thing about rule of law: When you make clear you won’t uphold it, those who might need its protection are a little less willing to do business with you.

 ?? ?? Catherine Rampell
Catherine Rampell

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States