Chattanooga Times Free Press

‘DEFICIT HAWK’ PRESIDES OVER A PORKFEST

-

President Joe Biden laughably passes himself off as a budget hawk. The soaring national debt and recent spending bills prove such assertions to be a glaring example of misinforma­tion.

Last week, Congress passed a $1.2 trillion measure to avert another government “shutdown.” Not surprising­ly, it includes billions in pork backed by both Republican and Democratic members. The budget watchdog opentheboo­ks.com counts about 1,400 spending initiative­s that reek of bacon. Not a peep out of the president.

“It’s the Mary Poppins method of governing, where a little bit of sugar makes the medicine go down, Adam Andrezejew­ski, CEO and founder of opentheboo­ks.com, told The National Desk. “Congress needs a little bit of corruption to pass these massive spending bills.”

A previous budget deal — which dealt with six of the 12 appropriat­ions bills that make up discretion­ary spending — contained nearly 6,000 earmarks at a cost of

$12.7 billion, according to Sen. Mike Lee, a Utah Republican.

Reason magazine’s Eric Boehm highlighte­d a handful of the most egregious examples of unnecessar­y federal spending, including $2.5 million for a kayaking facility in New Hampshire, $2.7 million for a bike path in a small West Virginia town and $3.5 million for the outfit that runs Detroit’s annual Thanksgivi­ng parade.

A group backed by former Vice President Mike Pence also compiled a list of what it views as wasteful “woke” pork initiative­s, including $1.1 million for “climate resilience and equity” in Massachuse­tts, $200 million for “gender equity and equality action” and $400,000 to a New Jersey company that provides “gender-affirming clothing.”

House Republican­s in 2011 banned earmarks, but Democrats reversed that move a decade later. To be sure, members of both parties eagerly engage in filling the federal trough as a means of currying favor with voters during their perpetual re-election campaigns. Defenders of the process argue that a few billion here and a few billion there have little impact on a multitrill­iondollar spending plan. But that’s the mindset that drives the nation’s descent into oceans of red ink.

In 1987, President Ronald Reagan vetoed an $88 billion — the number seems almost quaint today — highway and transporta­tion spending bill, which he described as “budgetbust­ing” and “unsound,” adding that “it represents a failure to exercise the discipline that is required to constrain federal spending, especially porkbarrel spending.” Congress, after two tries, mustered the votes to override the veto.

No president since then — Republican or Democrat — has exhibited similar resolve, and Biden will go along to get along. In the meantime, this president proposes $7 trillion annual budgets that depend on borrowing trillions more. Budget hawk, indeed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States