Chicago Sun-Times (Sunday)

To remain speaker, Madigan making lots of promises he probably can’t keep

- RICH MILLER @ capitolfax Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax, a daily political newsletter, and CapitolFax. com.

Outsiders may not get it, but it makes some sense that the majority of House Democrats still back House Speaker Michael Madigan’s reelection.

He’s been a genius at getting things done for his caucus. He is loyal to his people and has infinitely more institutio­nal memory and can pull more strings and push more buttons than anyone alive.

In his nearly 50 years in office, Madigan has been heavily involved with four legislativ­e remap processes and has been in the House for five of them.

Madigan has played a decisive role in every income tax increase ( temporary and permanent) since the tax was establishe­d in 1969 — and he was a delegate to the constituti­onal convention which created it.

He has also negotiated dozens of budgets since he became House speaker in 1983.

His campaign operation meticulous­ly tracks the number of knocked doors in contested races and every contact made, and he reviews that data each week and calls candidates to provide his feedback. He knows how to win.

And at this moment in history, with redistrict­ing coming up, a huge revenue shortfall, horrific budget problems, a massively destructiv­e pandemic causing rampant suffering and, in less than two years, a midterm election under a Democratic president ( with a new map), most of his members are rightly worried sick.

For these and many other reasons, this is exactly the moment when his members would need Madigan the most, and he most certainly knows this and is deftly playing on that angst as 19 of his members are in open revolt.

But the sweeping and aggressive federal investigat­ion is this/ close to Madigan now. Despite all of his protests of innocence and some reasonable arguments that he did nothing illegal, the G is obviously after Madigan’s head.

Gov. J. B. Pritzker has taken loads of heat for not pushing Madigan out of office, even though he couldn’t do it if he tried. Pritzker

is up for re- election in 2022 and a Madigan reelection would certainly mean big trouble. Yes, Pritzker won by 16 points two years ago, but that was during an unpopular Republican president’s midterm against a super- weak incumbent. He’s going to have to hustle to win.

A gubernator­ial confrontat­ion with a reelected Madigan is inevitable.

Pritzker pledged during the campaign and ever since taking office that he will veto a legislativ­e redistrict­ing plan that isn’t

“fair” which was defined ( by me) in March 2018 as any proposal “that is in any way drafted or created by legislator­s, political party leaders and/ or their staffs or allies.”

So, when Madigan told the House Black Caucus during a recent private meeting that he is the best person to draw the new map, he guaranteed that Pritzker had to veto it. There will be no finessing Pritzker’s pledge. And overriding a veto will be hugely difficult

because suburbanit­es who ran as good government types in swing districts and trueblue progressiv­es are gonna be in a major quandary. It’s pretty difficult to see how this fight gets as far as an override showdown.

Madigan also said during the meeting that he was prepared to pass another income tax increase if the governor requests it. Like with his remap pledge, his statement likely killed the already very slim prospects for a tax hike.

Just imagine the governor ( or any vulnerable Democrat) running in 2022 with Madigan still in office, a Madigan- drawn district map in place and a Madigan tax hike. Maybe the Democrats will get lucky and the Republican­s will nominate unelectabl­e far- right candidates, but basing your plan on your opponent collapsing is never a wise idea.

So, it’s just difficult to see how Madigan can keep all the reelection campaign promises he’s making.

If he wants to avoid the risk of a new district map being possibly drawn by the Republican­s after a losing veto fight, he’ll likely have to submit to a new process that won’t be nearly as advantageo­us to his members. A Madigan- backed tax hike is pretty much out of the question. Same goes for a gimmicky Madigan budget. And while he’s been the patronage and fixer king for decades, how much can he actually accomplish for his members when he’s under this horribly dark cloud?

No matter what, Madigan still has his unmatchabl­e campaign prowess going for him. But if he somehow manages to flip enough votes to get reelected in the first place and the feds don’t take him out, the reality going forward will be much different than he’s making it out to be.

 ??  ??
 ?? AP FILES ?? Illinois Speaker of the House Michael Madigan, D- Chicago, has played a decisive role in every income tax increase since the tax was establishe­d in 1969.
AP FILES Illinois Speaker of the House Michael Madigan, D- Chicago, has played a decisive role in every income tax increase since the tax was establishe­d in 1969.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States