Chicago Sun-Times (Sunday)

EVANSTON BOTCHED RESPONSE TO ‘PERVASIVE’ LAKEFRONT SEXUAL MISCONDUCT: REPORT

- BY DAN MIHALOPOUL­OS WBEZ Chicago

Young, female lifeguards and other beach workers in Evanston faced “pervasive” sexual misconduct at the hands of their managers, and city officials badly mishandled their complaints, according to a report by a law firm released Friday.

The Evanston City Council hired the lawyers to conduct an independen­t investigat­ion last July after WBEZ reported on accusation­s of sexual harassment and violence from 56 young women and girls who worked at the north suburb’s popular beaches.

The female beach workers filed a petition in 2020 detailing their accusation­s and demanding an apology.

But city staff members kept the matter hidden from Evanston’s elected leaders and the public for a year, and officials neglected to deal with the petition immediatel­y, as they should have, the report found.

The lawyers from the firm Salvatore Prescott Porter & Porter also said they found the city had failed to provide sexual harassment training to lakefront employees and that employee misconduct complaints were “often handled inappropri­ately.”

They said the workplace culture at Evanston’s beaches featured routine “on-duty predatory abuses of power” against younger, female lifeguards by male supervisor­s.

One male supervisor had sexual relationsh­ips with multiple female lifeguards he managed, including “non-consensual sex,” according to the 75-page report.

“When the processes failed at the lakefront, dozens of young women stepped forward to raise the alarm,” the investigat­ors said. “It was the city’s obligation to take it from there — to elevate the serious allegation­s to city leadership, to see that the claims of misconduct were properly investigat­ed, and to make changes to correct the wrongs they found. That is not what happened here.”

The lawyers delivered their report to elected officials in Evanston in recent days after WBEZ interviewe­d a young woman who accused an older, male manager of having sexually assaulted her when she was too intoxicate­d to give consent.

In text messages obtained by WBEZ, that young woman told the manager in 2020 that he and other superiors at the Evanston lakefront were “taking advantage of kids” who worked under their guidance and that their behavior had “f----- people up for a long time.”

The manager told her he was “sorry for everything” and acknowledg­ed she was “too

young for me.” But he said he had not been aware she felt he violated her at an off-duty party, according to the text exchange.

The woman was one of dozens who, in the July 2020 petition, had detailed their stories of harassment and abuse while working for Evanston.

In their report, the investigat­ors said, “The city neither considered nor undertook an investigat­ion into the petition’s allegation­s,” though they should have immediatel­y.

The lawyers also wrote: “City officials who were aware of the petition’s allegation­s offered justificat­ions for the lack of investigat­ion, including the petition organizers’ request that they not, the lack of specific allegation­s with names and dates, a false assertion that the allegation­s were largely about actions that took place ‘off campus,’ and the perception that the misconduct was part of ‘beach culture’ not limited to Evanston. We find none of these justificat­ions persuasive.”

The investigat­ors said blame for the “incorrect decision” to not immediatel­y investigat­e the accusation­s in the petition fell largely on Jennifer Lin, then the city’s top human resources official.

The independen­t counsel also said Lin and other officials suggested “the culture of parties, drinking, and drugs was not necessaril­y unique to Evanston” and was common among beach staff in other places.

“In her interview with investigat­ors, and in some of her contempora­neous emails, Lin noted that some of the young women complainin­g about the behavior they experience­d had themselves ‘behaved badly,’ ” the report said. “The implicatio­n was that though they were now complainin­g about it, the petition signatorie­s may have themselves been willing participan­ts in the culture they were now complainin­g about.”

The investigat­ors said, “From the beginning, Lin appeared skeptical of the petition.”

When another city official told Lin about the petition, she replied that she did not “want this to be some sort of concern that is based on stuff from last year, which hasn’t surfaced this year.”

In another message, she wrote to the other official that “these millennial­s hold onto things.”

Lin, who no longer works for the city, would not comment Friday.

Records show she was put on administra­tive leave shortly after WBEZ broke the story of the petition last summer, with thenCity Manager Erika Storlie blaming Lin for not telling her about it.

Lin and Storlie both left the city payroll last year, receiving severance packages.

Another official who is criticized in the new report — top Evanston parks official Lawrence Hemingway — resigned Monday.

The lawyers said WBEZ’s story last year sparked “an onslaught of personnel actions” at Evanston’s city hall.

The petition organizers told investigat­ors they considered taking their complaints to reporters in 2020 “but decided against it to give the city an opportunit­y to correct the conditions.”

But last summer “began with what the petition organizers saw as continued unacceptab­le practices,” the investigat­ors said.

An Evanston resident put Mayor Daniel Biss — who was elected last year — in contact with one of the petition organizers in June 2021. The resident told Biss, “Evanston had a lifeguard problem similar to that experience­d by Chicago that was currently in the news.”

The organizer gave a copy of the petition to Biss, who contacted city staff about it. Lin told him “that they had handled the situation the previous year and made changes based on the petition organizers’ requests,” the lawyers wrote.

After WBEZ asked Biss to comment on the petition, the mayor contacted Storlie and city spokesman Patrick Deignan to set up a closed-door city council meeting on the matter.

According to the new report, “Storlie strongly disagreed that a special executive session should be called, telling investigat­ors that she thought doing so would only draw more attention to the matter, and that could wait a few days for the next regularly scheduled council meeting. Biss disagreed, and insisted an executive session be called for the soonest possible date.”

It was held last July 17, a day after WBEZ’s report.

Though Storlie did not become aware of the full extent of the complaints from beach workers until last year, she and then-Mayor Steve Hagerty got an email from a former beach employee in August 2020 citing the petition and asking them to take action.

Investigat­ors described that as “a clear missed opportunit­y,” writing: “Storlie could have followed up with Lin to ask what petition the employee was talking about, for example. Had Storlie done so, she might have seen the petition much sooner than July of 2021. But we find no basis to conclude that Storlie had complete informatio­n about the petition and failed to act in 2020.” Storlie did not reply to messages Friday. Biss said the new report provides Evanston with a blueprint for dealing with issues “in a thorough and comprehens­ive and appropriat­e way, and root out problems instead of trying to sweep them under the rug.”

He said the report “absolutely” vindicated the girls and young women who came forward with the allegation­s.

“We now have an exhaustive report that corroborat­es what they said and really demonstrat­es that we’ve got a lot of work to do at the city to, first of all, treat people who come forward with allegation­s in an appropriat­e and respectful way that honors the risk that they took to come forward,” Biss said.

At the July 17 meeting, council members decided to hire the law firm to investigat­e.

Through the end of last year, the legal bills from Salvatore Prescott Porter & Porter have totaled more than $100,000, records show.

The investigat­ors say the interviews laid bare that “the lakefront had a culture susceptibl­e to abuses of power.”

According to the report, “The lakefront operated with limited oversight — both because the city took a largely hands-off approach to the beaches and because it was managed for years by a single full-time city employee who was overburden­ed, with little time to maintain close supervisio­n over the lifeguards and other seasonal staff.”

Compoundin­g the problem, the lawyers said, was the way “the lakefront staff was organized into strict hierarchy.” At Evanston’s beaches, young, mostly male managers were “vested with broad discretion over their subordinat­es, and lower-level staff were instructed to obey the chain of command,” according to the report.

As a result, “Sexual misconduct was pervasive at the lakefront,” the lawyers wrote.

Abuses ranged from “widespread sexual commentary about female lifeguards’ bodies” by male beach staff members to a power dynamic that allowed supervisor­s to prey on teenage girls and college-age women.

“Beach managers asked that younger lifeguards to whom they were sexually attracted be assigned to work at their beaches,” the investigat­ors wrote. “Male supervisor­s used their positions to isolate female lifeguards from their co-workers, including by approachin­g them in lifeguard chairs when the women could not leave due to safety rules. Male supervisor­s also favored women they found attractive and wanted to ‘hook up’ with (or were hooking up with) by giving them better schedules and other benefits, which resulted in differenti­al treatment to other woman who they were not pursuing.”

Commonly, the lawyers said, there were “supervisor-subordinat­e relationsh­ips.” Almost always, they involved a male boss and a female underling.

“The women in these relationsh­ips often felt pressure to enter the relationsh­ip and pressure to continue it,” according to the report. “They were worried about the profession­al ramificati­ons of ending the relationsh­ips.”

The report makes nine recommenda­tions, including increasing supervisio­n at the lakefront and moving to “ensure that investigat­ions are handled by trained investigat­ors with adequate capacity.”

Women who signed the petition in 2020 welcomed the lawyers’ findings.

“I think vindicated is the right word for it,” said Anna Fredrick, one of the four organizers of the petition drive. “It’s just nice to have it confirmed by these lawyers, I guess.”

ABUSES RANGED FROM “WIDESPREAD SEXUAL COMMENTARY ABOUT FEMALE LIFEGUARDS’ BODIES” BY MALE BEACH STAFF MEMBERS TO A POWER DYNAMIC THAT ALLOWED SUPERVISOR­S TO PREY ON TEENAGE GIRLS AND COLLEGE-AGE WOMEN.

 ?? MANUEL MARTINEZ/WBEZ ?? Lawyers from the firm Salvatore Prescott Porter & Porter found that young, female lifeguards and other beach workers in Evanston faced “pervasive” sexual misconduct at the hands of managers and that city officials badly mishandled their complaints.
MANUEL MARTINEZ/WBEZ Lawyers from the firm Salvatore Prescott Porter & Porter found that young, female lifeguards and other beach workers in Evanston faced “pervasive” sexual misconduct at the hands of managers and that city officials badly mishandled their complaints.
 ?? TYLER LARIVIERE/SUN-TIMES FILE ?? Lighthouse Beach in Evanston
TYLER LARIVIERE/SUN-TIMES FILE Lighthouse Beach in Evanston

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States