Chicago Sun-Times

Turns out, Taste trim terrific

- BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter Email: fspielman@suntimes.com Twitter: @fspielman

Taste of Chicago turned a profit in 2013 for the first time in six years — thanks in part to perfect weather and a popular music lineup — turning Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s revised, bumped and abbreviate­d format into a keeper.

Taste of Chicago turned a profit in 2013 for the first time in six years — thanks to a recipe that included perfect weather, a popular music lineup, celebrity chefs and food trucks — turning Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s revised, bumped and abbreviate­d format into a keeper.

One year after losing $1.3 million, the Taste made $272,000. That’s a nearly $1.6 million turnaround in just one year for a lakefront showcase that, some feared, was headed for the scrap heap.

“It’s a better event. We worked with the layout. We added new features. There’s a lot more to explore. It’s not the same old Taste. It’s new. There are more dining options,” Cultural Affairs and Special Events Commission­er Michelle Boone said Friday.

“Chicagoans have become more sophistica­ted in the way they experience food. The addition of the pop-up booths, chef-du-jour tents and food trucks. There’s a lot more to experience. And the main stage performers were some of the best. They were a big draw. It reinforces to us that Chicagoans and visitors still value Taste of Chicago. It’s still relevant and still a great way to experience Chicago’s restaurant scene.”

Only a year ago, escalating losses prompted Boone to warn that Taste of Chicago may never return to profitabil­ity. That’s even though it once was a cash cow that supported other major festivals.

Asked whether the one-year turnaround solidifies the Taste’s future, she said, “Based on what happened in 2013, we’re prepared to move forward. As long as the event continues to demonstrat­e that it is a good investment of taxpayer dollars, an efficient way to market Chicago restaurant­s, a vehicle for drawing tourists and a priority for the mayor, we will continue.”

Emanuel said the Taste is a “great event” with a “far-reaching impact” on Chicago and he’s pleased the changes he ordered stopped the bleeding.

“We revamped the Taste to bring new food options, including food trucks, internatio­nally renowned chefs and music from chart-topping acts to attract people from all over the world,” the mayor was quoted as saying in a press release.

To reverse $1 million in losses in 2011 alone, Emanuel cut the Taste — from 10 days to five — and bumped it to mid-July from its prime position around July 4.

The number of restaurant­s was reduced. So-called “pop-up” restaurant­s that had never before participat­ed were allowed to get in on the Taste for just one day without paying the $3,000 applicatio­n fee, in exchange for 20 percent of their revenues. Five-day participan­ts pay the fee and share 18 percent of their revenues with the city.

Celebrity chefs prepared threecours­e, sit-down meals for $40 a person.

For the first time, Taste patrons were asked to pay $25 each for 3,000 reserved concert seats at the Petrillo Music Shell that had long been free.

To skeptics, it looked like the new mayor was preparing to wash his hands of an event that had become a drain on taxpayers and suffered security problems.

Those fears turned out to be unfounded.

Attendance rose by 300,000 in 2013 — to 1.5 million — generating $5.7 million from the sale of food and beverage tickets, up from $4.1 million the year before.

The celebrity chef tent pulled in $30,000.

A marquee music lineup that included Robin Thicke, Robert Plant, Jill Scott and Fun generated $338,000 in concert revenues, with 16 food trucks, five-per-night, selling their culinary creations to Petrillo patrons. Last year’s lineup that featured Jennifer Hudson and Death Cab for Cutie generated $255,450 in ticket sales.

A market-research firm that surveyed 450 patrons and collected informatio­n from hotels and businesses pegged the economic impact of Taste at $106 million, including $2.35 million in local tax revenue.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States