Chicago Sun-Times

Look in the mirror, fellow Republican­s

- BY LINDA CHAVEZ Linda Chavez is the author of ”An Unlikely Conservati­ve: The Transforma­tion of an Ex-Liberal.”

Will Republican­s learn the right lessons from the debacle that is the Trump candidacy? I am doubtful, because for many, it requires a good, hard look in the mirror.

Donald Trump didn’t create the masses supporting him, he simply played into their fears and prejudices, which have been nursed for the last decade by conservati­ve talk show hosts, cable news programs, websites, grass-roots groups and not a few GOP elected officials.

Like Trump’s presidenti­al campaign announceme­nt, it began with immigratio­n. It seems like an eon ago that Trump declared, “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best . . . They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us [sic]. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

This sweeping denunciati­on — not of illegal immigratio­n, mind you, but of Mexicans and the government of Mexico — would have been enough in normal times to sink most candidates. But the media gave him a pass, and many on the right embraced his supposed candor.

National Review’s editor Rich Lowry wrote a column “Sorry, Donald Trump Has a Point,” arguing, “For all its crassness, Trump’s rant on immigratio­n is closer to reality than the gauzy cliches of the immigratio­n romantics unwilling to acknowledg­e that there might be an issue welcoming large numbers of high-school dropouts into a 21st-century economy.” I responded immediatel­y with my own NRO piece, “Stop Defending Donald Trump.” But it took the magazine months to decide that Trump was unhinged and a danger to the conservati­ve movement.

The right has made opposition to immigratio­n — increasing­ly legal immigratio­n as well as illegal — the sine qua non of conservati­sm for some time now. Conservati­ves who argue, as I do, that our immigratio­n system needs a dramatic overhaul are routinely denounced as open-borders traitors because we favor making it easier for workers with needed skills to immigrate legally and giving legal status to those illegal immigrants whose labor we depend on — and who have paid taxes and broken no other laws.

There is certainly room for legitimate debate about immigratio­n policy among conservati­ves. One can argue for lower immigratio­n levels, more diversity among the immigrant pool and certainly for better border security in good conscience. But suggesting that immigrants are “taking jobs from Americans” and that they have “high rates of criminalit­y” — neither of which is true — feeds into a narrative that was ripe for the extremism that Trump has spouted.

But the problem isn’t only immigratio­n. Government itself has become the enemy for many conservati­ves. Instead of arguments for limited government and smaller bureaucrac­ies, many on the right have begun to sound more like anarchists than Burkean conservati­ves. Republican elected officials — even staunchly conservati­ve ones — get labeled as Republican In Name Only, so that all who serve in public life become immediatel­y suspect. If you can’t trust anyone who holds office now, an outsider like Donald Trump has a natural opening.

It is difficult to see an easy way out of the morass that has become the conservati­ve movement. Conservati­sm has managed to hold together despite the inherent strains among its various elements, in large part because winning elections was considered important enough to minimize difference­s. Libertaria­ns and economic conservati­ves might not have embraced social conservati­ves’ agenda (and vice versa), but they were willing to make peace in order to elect representa­tives who were at least marginally better than the alternativ­e Democrat. Deficit hawks might have worried that defense conservati­ves would pile up more debt, but they knew prospects were worse if Democrats were elected. Paleocons could sit side-by-side with neo-cons with some uneasiness, but not outright enmity.

No more. These arrangemen­ts now look like quaint relics of a genteel past, not the realpoliti­k of election victory. We conservati­ves are likely to lose the 2016 election as a result, and, frankly, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

It is difficult to see an easy way out of the morass that has become the conservati­ve movement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States