Chicago Sun-Times

Struggle for voting rights justice goes on in Wisconsin

- JESSE JACKSON | THINKSTOCK

On April 4, we celebrated the life of Dr. Martin Luther King even as we marked the 48th anniversar­y of his assassinat­ion. On April 5, voters will go to the polls in the Wisconsin primaries, but a new raft of voter suppressio­n laws will ensure that the results are skewed. One of Dr. King’s great legacies — the Voting Rights Act — is now under assault across the country.

In Wisconsin, voter suppressio­n laws were passed by a conservati­ve Republican legislatur­e despite the fact that there was no evidence of voter fraud to justify them. The legislatur­e seemed intent on passing the most restrictiv­e laws. They passed the whole passel of conservati­ve model laws and invented a few more. The laws were challenged in court, but the Supreme Court refused to review a lower court decision leaving them in place.

The voter suppressio­n laws include requiring a photo ID for voting, a measure that may impact an estimated 300,000 voters, disproport­ionately older, younger, poor and people of color. They reduced early voting times from 30 days to 12 days and eliminated it on weekends and evenings, discrimina­ting against workers who can’t get leave to go to the polls. They eliminated statewide certificat­ion of registrars, so registrars can only enroll voters in the county where they are certified, making registrati­on more difficult. They eliminated faxing and emailing of absentee ballots — except to military and overseas voters — making absentee voting more difficult. They eliminated straight ticket voting, except for military and overseas voters, ensuring that waiting times and lines will be longer when people go to vote. They made it harder to use student ID as proof of residence, even as they required proof of residence to vote.

The thrust of these laws is clear: They are designed to make it harder to vote, particular­ly for working people who can’t take time off, for students, for the elderly who may not have the right ID, for the poor and people of color. No wonder Bernie Sanders denounced the suppressio­n laws as “truly un- American.” Hillary Clinton’s legal counsel challenged them in court. Key constituen­ts of both candidates will be impacted. The Wisconsin primary results will be distorted — and that is the intent.

In the general election, these laws will be most destructiv­e to the Democratic voting base, not the Republican base. And that is intentiona­l also.

This is a disgrace. Fortyeight years after Dr. King’s death, we witness how much of his agenda remains unfinished, how much is being reversed. He marched against inequality and poverty, but inequality is worse, and childhood poverty in the United States is the worst of any major country. He marched for equal protec- tion under the laws, but our system of racial injustice continues to discrimina­te, particular­ly against young black men. He marched for voting rights, and now across the country conservati­ves are systematic­ally passing laws to making voting harder. He protested against the endless war in Vietnam that robbed the funds needed for the war on poverty at home.

And now we seem stuck in endless wars without victory on the other side of the world, even as our own neighborho­ods suffer from the lack of public investment in everything from clean water systems to public schools.

Dr. King will be remembered for helping to make America better. But he always taught us that justice can’t be inherited. Equal opportunit­y can’t be taken for granted. “Human progress,” he wrote, “is neither automatic nor inevitable. . . . Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering and struggle, the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individual­s.”

And as Wisconsin will show, the struggle must continue simply to guarantee every American the right to vote. Email: jjackson@ rainbowpus­h. org

Twitter: @ RevJJackso­n

He marched for voting rights, and now across the country conservati­ves are systematic­ally passing laws to making voting harder.

 ??  ?? The U. S. Supreme Court refused to review a decision
upholding Wisconsin’s voting laws.
The U. S. Supreme Court refused to review a decision upholding Wisconsin’s voting laws.
 ??  ?? SUN- TIMES PRINT COLLECTION
SUN- TIMES PRINT COLLECTION
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States