Chicago Sun-Times

Feds charge 56 in fraud scheme

$ 300M allegedly taken from 15,000 victims using call center workers in India posing as federal agents

- Kevin Johnson Contributi­ng: Kevin McCoy

Federal authoritie­s unsealed an indictment Thursday, charging 56 people in a vast scheme in which suspects posed as Internal Revenue Service agents and immigratio­n authoritie­s to siphon more than $ 300 million from thousands of unwitting victims to clear fictitious deportatio­n warrants and phony tax debts.

The scheme, which employed a network of telephone call centers based in India, relied on personal informatio­n obtained from data brokers to target at least 15,000 victims with threats of fines, deportatio­n or imprisonme­nt if they did not pay the demanded fees.

In the thousands of cases where victims agreed to settle the fictitious accounts, the money allegedly was laundered through U. S. co- conspirato­rs using wire transfers and debit cards.

Twenty of the 24 U. S. suspects were arrested Thursday, officials said. One other is in immigratio­n custody, arrests are pending against two more and a fourth, Jerry Norris, 46, of Oakland, is being sought by federal authoritie­s. Thirty- two suspects were believed to be living in India, and the court documents also outlined charges against five call center operations. U. S. officials said that they would seek to prosecute the Indian suspects in the United States.

“This is a transnatio­nal problem and demonstrat­es that modern criminals target Americans both from inside our borders and from abroad,” Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell said of the alleged activity uncovered during a three- year investigat­ion.

The co- conspirato­rs, according to federal authoritie­s, used “hawala transfers” in which money is transferre­d internatio­nally outside of the formal banking system to direct funds to accounts be- longing to U. S.- based individual­s.

According to the indictment, the conspirato­rs allegedly kept a percentage of the proceeds for taking part.

In the case of a San Diego victim, prosecutor­s allege that a call center extorted $ 12,300 from an 85- year- old woman after threatenin­g her with arrest if she did not settle phony tax violations. The same day that the payment was made, a U. S.- based suspect allegedly loaded a debit card to buy money orders in Frisco, Texas.

Another California victim lost $ 136,000 to suspects posing as IRS agents demanding payment for fictitious tax charges. The suspects, according to court documents, contacted the victim multiple times during a period of 20 days. The money was then allegedly transferre­d to multiple debit cards.

In some cases, prosecutor­s allege, the conspirato­rs requested “good- faith deposits” from victims in exchange for the promise of phony grants and loans.

“To potential victims, our message today is simple,” said Peter Edge, an executive associate director with Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t. “U. S. government agencies do not make these types of calls. And if you receive one, contact law enforcemen­t ... before you make a payment.”

The Indian call centers were described in court documents as akin to high- octane boiler- room enterprise­s, which maintained daily attendance sheets and distribute­d “lead lists” identifyin­g potential targets for callers.

All five of the call centers were in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, according to court documents.

“During the course of the conspiracy, the call center conglomera­tes often acted together to effect the scheme to include: sharing call scripts and lists of potential victims, processing payments for each other and liquidatin­g victim scammed funds,” prosecutor­s asserted.

“The defendants have perpetrate­d an enormous and complex fraud scheme that resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in victim losses,” the court documents stated.

Although the volume of suspected scam calls around the U. S. dropped after the India raids, victims continued to be identified, said Timothy Camus, deputy inspector general for investigat­ions at the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administra­tion.

“We feared all along there were multiple call centers responsibl­e for this activity,” he said.

“U. S. government agencies do not make these types of calls. And if you receive one, contact law enforcemen­t ... before you make a payment.” Peter Edge, Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t

 ?? PABLO MARTINEZ MONSIVAIS, AP ?? Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell, center, of the Criminal Division; Kenneth Magidson, left, of the Southern District of Texas; and Bruce M. Foucart, director, National Intellectu­al Property Rights Coordinati­on Center, give a news conference...
PABLO MARTINEZ MONSIVAIS, AP Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell, center, of the Criminal Division; Kenneth Magidson, left, of the Southern District of Texas; and Bruce M. Foucart, director, National Intellectu­al Property Rights Coordinati­on Center, give a news conference...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States