Chicago Sun-Times

CPS’ BOND SHELL

- BY FRAN SPIELMAN AND LAUREN FITZPATRIC­K Staff Reporters

Who’d have thought the financiall­y strapped Chicago Public Schools could get an Arated bond today? It happened Thursday. Fitch gave a proposed bond issue an A rating with a stable outlook — that’s eight steps above the junk rating of Bplus with a negative outlook that the ratings agency has assigned to the $ 6.8 billion in CPS’ general obligation debt. The Kroll Bond Rating Agency Inc. also rated the bonds at BBB, deeming them of “medium quality.”

CPS accomplish­ed the feat in two ways: first by proposing the sale of a half- billion dollars in capital bonds tied to a special property tax, and second, by raising the specter of a “hypothetic­al bankruptcy” in its bond offering to assuage investor fears about the cashstrapp­ed district’s financial risk.

Last February, CPS had to pay a whole lot more to borrow less than planned after Gov. Bruce Rauner raised the possibilit­y of forcing the state’s largest district into bankruptcy.

State law doesn’t permit school districts to declare bankruptcy, nor is that likely to change anytime soon so long as the General Assembly remains in Democratic hands. But borrowing costs jumped right after the governor’s mention of the b- word.

CPS is now preparing to sell $ 500 million in bonds toward nearly a billion’s worth of capital improvemen­ts, and keep its costs of borrowing as low as possible. Officials plan to speak with potential investors next week.

A preliminar­y prospectus released this week contends that those investors have nothing to fear. That’s because the bevy of up to $ 938 million in new school constructi­on projects — including several brand new schools — will be financed by a $ 45 million property tax increase approved by the City Council last year for the sole purpose of school constructi­on.

It is, therefore, insulated from the larger financial crisis caused by Rauner’s surprise veto of a bill that would have provided $ 215 million in state pension help to CPS.

If the governor’s veto is not overturned, CPS could have no choice but to cut deeply into classrooms that already have been assaulted in recent years by multiple rounds of cuts.

In a recorded investor presentati­on attached to the bond documents, Ronald DeNard, senior vice president of finance for CPS, portrayed the capital improvemen­t tax as providing “unique credit and security.”

“The credit is secured by a new, unencumber­ed, limited purpose, dedicated property tax levy within the school district that will be statutoril­y limited to capital improvemen­t. [ It] cannot be used for operating expenses,” DeNard said.

“The CIT aren’t general revenue nor are they available for debt service on any of the board’s existing debt.”

To further reassure skittish investors, CPS attached to the prospectus a pair of legal opinions on a “hypothetic­al bankruptcy” by the state’s largest school system.

Bond counsel Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP and underwrite­rs’ counsel McDermott Will & Emery LLP both say that the property tax levy for capital improvemen­ts would qualify as “special revenues” isolated from general operations under the U. S. Bankruptcy code.

That means there would be no risk to investors, even in the event of a CPS bankruptcy. The bonds would be exempt from a typical automatic stay on debt held by an entity filing for bankruptcy protection­s.

Investors would be further protected by a “direct intercept” structure that means CPS never touches the money from the special property tax. A provided flowchart shows the tax money going from taxpayers to county collectors to a third- party trustee. The debt- service fund is at the top of the payment list.

District officials did not immediatel­y respond to requests for comment.

“Because bondholder­s will be paid out of the special levy, they would ( in theory at least) continue to be paid during a district bankruptcy,” Matt Fabian, a partner at Municipal Market Analytics, said in an email. “In the case of CPS, where the problems are all on the expenditur­e side and not the revenue side, a cleaner connection between the levy and bondholder­s will be attractive for at least some investors. Meaning a lower interest rate.

“The problem is that there is no silver bullet,” he continued. “CPS still faces massive headline risk, an untenable budget situation and a governor who appears to want to make things more difficult, not less. That equates to major negative momentum.”

Earlier this year, Mayor Rahm Emanuel charged that CPS was forced to pay more to borrow less because of Rauner’s continued talk of bankruptcy — and if that was the governor’s intention, it was “shameful.”

One week after abruptly halting a bond sale needed to keep the school doors open through the end of the school year, CPS returned to Wall Street — but paid a huge price.

Instead of borrowing $ 875 million, the bond issue was scaled back to $ 725 million. And instead of paying the 7.75 percent interest rate offered on the tax- exempt bonds, CPS had to promise buyers a higher yield of 8.5 percent.

 ??  ?? Ronald DeNard, senior vice president of finance for CPS, described the capital improvemen­t tax as providing “unique credit and security.”
| SUN- TIMES FILES
Ronald DeNard, senior vice president of finance for CPS, described the capital improvemen­t tax as providing “unique credit and security.” | SUN- TIMES FILES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States