Chicago Sun-Times

ILLINOIS’ ABORTION TRIGGER LAW‘ A NIGHTMARE SCENARIO FOR WOMEN’

- NEIL STEINBERG Follow Neil Steinberg on Twitter: @NeilSteinb­erg Email: nsteinberg@suntimes.com

There’s no need to worry now that Donald Trump has nominated conservati­ve Colorado judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, with an eye on overturnin­g Roe v. Wade, and could name additional conservati­ve justices in the future. You live here in the good old blue state of Illinois. Hillary Clinton country. Your ability to control your own body won’t be threatened, not like that of all those poor women in Texas and Indiana and other backwaters. Right? Wrong. Ladies, meet 720 Illinois Criminal Statute 510, as described in the Abortion Law of 1975. The bill grudgingly admits that abortion is legal, for the moment, but restates Illinois’ belief that a fetus is a full human being from themoment of conception, and declares:

“. . . if those decisions of the United States Supreme Court are ever reversed or modified or the United States Constituti­on is amended to allow protection of the unborn then the former policy of this State to prohibit abortions unless necessary for the preservati­on of the mother’s life shall be reinstated.”

In layman’s terms: The moment Roe is overturned, abortions are banned in Illinois unless the mother’s life is at risk, one of four states to share what legislator­s call a “trigger law.” The other states are Kentucky, Louisiana and South Dakota.

If you’ve never heard of it, join the club.

“Very few people know,” said state Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D- Chicago. “The reaction is the kind of shock and disbelief youmight imagine. It is the virtual smack upside the head.”

“If the Supreme Court ever overturns Roe, immediatel­y in the state of Illinois all abortions become illegal and criminaliz­ed,” said state Rep. Sara Feigenholt­z, D- Chicago, who has introduced House Bill 40 into the General Assembly to void the trigger law. “To get ahead of what might be a nightmare scenario for women in this state, we should strike those words. We need to be ready in case the worst happens, the unthinkabl­e.”

The bill also removes provisions in Illinois law that deny insurance coverage for an abortion to women who depend on Medicaid and State Employee Health Insurance. Fifteen other states already provide such funding. Why wasn’t this done years ago? “People never took it seriously when we would raise it in the past,” said Lorie Chaiten, director of the Women’s and Reproducti­ve Rights Project at the ACLU of Illinois. “But people are taking it seriously now.”

“I think if we had tried to do it in the past, even the recent past, we would be a laughingst­ock because [ overturnin­g Roe] was never going to happen,” said Kelly. “We would have had the same reaction: ‘ Why are you fixing something that’s not broken?’ We knew it wasn’t fine, and we’re here now. Now it is an emergency. ”

The good news is that Gorsuch only replaces Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016. His replacemen­t will return the court to the balance it already had. But liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and Anthony Kennedy— a conservati­ve who experts believe wouldn’t vote to overturn Roe v. Wade— is 80. What if Trump should last four or eight years?

“We’re very concerned,” said Brigid Leahy, director of public policy at Planned Parenthood of Illinois. “If Trump has the ability to appoint another justice, we do not want to wait to see what happens. We want to make sure abortion stays safe and legal in Illinois.” What are the bill’s chances? “We’re hoping,” said Feigenholt­z. “We’re going to call this bill in committee as soon as they convene in early February.”

“I really hope that some of the more moderate folks who have said over the years, ‘ I can’t be with you on this, I would never let it become illegal,’ meant it, because I’m coming back to them now, and I expect their vote,” said Kelly.

This affects women, not only in Illinois, but surroundin­g states.

“Illinois is a safe haven for women,” said Leahy. “We have already seen over the last 10 years, a very concerted nationwide effort to pass state level restrictio­ns that make it so difficult for women to obtain abortions. They’re already leaving their home states, coming here to Illinois. Planned Parenthood sees women from surroundin­g states. Iowa and Missouri, Indiana and Kentucky. It ends up being easier for them to travel to Springfiel­d.”

And should readers bemoved to try to act on this, what should they do?

“Call their state representa­tives,” Feigenholt­z said. “Make sure their legislator­s are supporting HB 40. This is going to be themost important piece of women’s legislatio­n in this general assembly.”

“We are working all day and all night to pass this bill so that women in this state can have access to safe and legal abortions,” she continued. “We are not going backward. We are not. We just can’t. We’re going to fight to the end on this.” Here we disagree. We obviously are going backward. We just elected President Backward, who is going to sign pieces of paper until the country marches back with him into their imagined past. The question now is: How far?

“IF TRUMP HAS THE ABILITY TO APPOINT ANOTHER JUSTICE, WE DO NOT WANT TOWAIT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS. WEWANT TO MAKE SURE ABORTION STAYS SAFE AND LEGAL IN ILLINOIS.” BRIGID LEAHY, Planned Parenthood of Illinois’ director of public policy

 ??  ?? Activists on both sides of the abortion debate mix while demonstrat­ing in front of theU. S. Supreme Court during the March For Life.
Activists on both sides of the abortion debate mix while demonstrat­ing in front of theU. S. Supreme Court during the March For Life.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States