Chicago Sun-Times

Polish free speech ban noway to end Holocaust accusation­s

- BYJACOB SULLUM Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason magazine.

In Poland, as in several other European countries, it is a crime to deny the Holocaust. Soon, thanks to a bill that was approved by the lower house of the Polish parliament on Friday, it may also be a crime to discuss the Holocaust too frankly.

The pending ban on references to Polish complicity in Nazi genocide, which has provoked outrage in Israel and around the world, may seem inconsiste­nt with the ban on Holocaust denial. But the two taboos are of a piece with each other and with Poland’s prohibitio­n of ethnic insults— a fact that should give pause to American fans of European- style speech regulation.

The Polish bill makes it a crime, punishable by fines and up to three years in prison, to accuse “the Polish nation, or the Polish state, of being responsibl­e or complicit in the Nazi crimes committed by the Third German Reich.” The legislatio­n was motivated largely by anger at the common use of phrases like “Polish death camps,” which could be read to mean that the war crimes committed by Germans in occupied Poland were a project of the Polish government.

“German Nazi crimes are attributed to Poles,” Deputy Justice Minister Patryk Jaki complained last week. “And so far the Polish state has not been able to effectivel­y fight these types of insults to the Polish nation.”

Some of these “insults” happen to be true, since part of “the Polish nation” was “complicit in the Nazi crimes.” Poles saved Jews, but Poles also murdered Jews, under Nazi instructio­n and on their own initiative.

Acknowledg­ing that complicate­d and troubling reality could expose people to criminal liability under the proposed law, notwithsta­nding its focus on statements “contrary to fact” and its exemption for people engaged in “artistic or scientific activities.”

The bill, which applies to mistakes as well as deliberate misreprese­ntations, charges the government with determinin­g what is true and whose motives are elevated enough to shield them from prosecutio­n.

The impact of such a system goes far beyond the people who are actually fined or imprisoned, since the possibilit­y of an investigat­ion encourages self- censorship. The result— people afraid to speak their minds, lest they attract unwanted attention from the government— hardly seems consistent with the “freedom to express opinions” and “disseminat­e informatio­n” guaranteed by the Polish constituti­on.

The same could be said of the Polish laws that make a criminal out of anyone who minimizes or denies Nazi war crimes or who insults or incites hatred against people based on their nationalit­y, ethnicity, race, or religion. These are fuzzy categories that invite arbitrary and unpredicta­ble enforcemen­t, chilling speech that might offend the sensibilit­ies of protected groups.

The proposed ban on charges of Polish complicity in the Holocaust is similar in logic as well as impact, since it criminaliz­es “insults to the Polish nation,” a kind of group defamation. The same principle that is aimed at protecting minorities from verbal oppression can be easily adapted by majorities seeking to suppress speech that makes them uncomforta­ble.

We need not look abroad to see how slippery the concept of hate speech can be. Last year Howard Dean, former governor of Vermont and former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, argued that the University of California at Berkeley’s decision to cancel a speech by conservati­ve commentato­r Ann Coulter did not raise any constituti­onal issues because “hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment.”

Dean was wrong about that, since “hate speech” is not a legally relevant category in the United States, and his loose use of the phrase demonstrat­ed why making it so would be dangerous. Why bother to argue with your opponents when you can have them arrested?

The Polish legislator­s who want to criminaliz­e speech that offends them are trying the same shortcut. The only way to close it off is by rejecting, once and for all, the illiberal idea that people have a right not to be offended.

The Polish bill makes it a crime to accuse “the Polish nation, or the Polish state, of being responsibl­e or complicit in the Nazi crimes committed by the Third German Reich.”

 ?? CZAREK SOKOLOWSKI/ AP ?? A Holocaust survivor wears a prisoner armband at the Auschwitz Nazi death camp in Oswiecim, Poland.
CZAREK SOKOLOWSKI/ AP A Holocaust survivor wears a prisoner armband at the Auschwitz Nazi death camp in Oswiecim, Poland.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States