Chicago Sun-Times

John Paul Stevens, who served on Supreme Court for 35 years, dies at 99

- BY MARK SHERMAN AND CONNIE CASS

WASHINGTON — John Paul Stevens, the bow-tied, independen­t-thinking, Republican nominated justice who unexpected­ly emerged as the Supreme Court’s leading liberal, died Tuesday in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, after suffering a stroke Monday. He was 99.

During nearly 35 years on the court, Stevens stood for the freedom and dignity of individual­s, be they students or immigrants or prisoners. He acted to limit the death penalty, squelch official prayer in schools, establish gay rights, promote racial equality and preserve legal abortion. He protected the rights of crime suspects and illegal immigrants facing deportatio­n.

He influenced fellow justices to give foreign terrorism suspects held for years at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, naval base the right to plead for their release in U.S. courts.

Stevens served more than twice the average tenure for a justice, and was only the second to mark his 90th birthday on the high court. From his appointmen­t by President Gerald Ford in 1975 through his retirement in June 2010, he shaped decisions that touched countless aspects of American life.

“He brought to our bench an inimitable blend of kindness, humility, wisdom and independen­ce. His unrelentin­g commitment to justice has left us a better nation,” Chief Justice John Roberts said in a statement.

He remained an active writer and speaker into his late 90s, surprising some when he came out against Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on following Kavanaugh’s angry denial of sexual assault allegation­s.

At first considered a centrist, Stevens came to be seen as a lion of liberalism. But he rejected that characteri­zation.

“I don’t think of myself as a liberal at all,” Stevens told The New York Times in 2007. “I think as part of my general politics, I’m pretty darn conservati­ve.”

The way Stevens saw it, he held to the same ground, but the court had shifted steadily to the right over the decades, creating the illusion that he was moving leftward.

He did change his views on some issues, however. He morphed from a critic of affirmativ­e action to a supporter, and came to believe the death penalty was wrong.

His legal reasoning was often described as unpredicta­ble or idiosyncra­tic, especially in his early years on the court. He was a prolific writer of separate opinions laying out his own thinking, whether he agreed or disagreed with the majority’s ruling.

Stevens, eyes often twinkling behind owlish glasses, was the picture of old-fashioned geniality on the court and off. He took an unusually courteous tone with lawyers arguing their cases, but he was no pushover. After his fellow justices fired off questions, Stevens would politely weigh in. “May I ask a question?” he’d ask gently, then quickly slice to the weakest point of a lawyer’s argument.

Stevens was especially concerned with the plight of ordinary citizens up against the government or other powerful interests — a type of struggle he witnessed as a boy.

When he was 14, his father, owner of a grand but failing Chicago hotel, was wrongly convicted of embezzleme­nt. Ernest Stevens was vindicated on appeal, but decades later his son would say the family’s ordeal taught him that justice can misfire.

More often, however, Stevens credited his sensitivit­y to abuses of power by police and prosecutor­s to what he learned while representi­ng criminal defendants in pro bono cases as a young Chicago lawyer.

He voiced only one regret about his Supreme Court career: that he had supported reinstatin­g the death penalty in 1976. More than three decades later, Stevens publicly declared his opposition to capital punishment, saying that years of bad court decisions had overlooked racial bias, favored prosecutor­s and otherwise undermined his expectatio­n that death sentences could be handed down fairly.

One of his harshest dissents came when the court lifted restrictio­ns on spending by corporatio­ns and unions to sway elections. He called the 2010 ruling “a rejection of the common sense of the American people” and a threat to democracy.

As he read parts of that opinion aloud, Stevens’ voice wavered uncharacte­ristically and

he repeatedly stumbled over words. For the 90-year-old who’d worried he wouldn’t know when to bow out, it was a signal. “That was the day I decided to resign,” Stevens said later. He also disclosed in his autobiogra­phy that he had suffered a mini-stroke.

Born in 1920, Stevens was a privileged child of a bygone era: He met Amelia Earhart and Charles Lindbergh at the family hotel and was at Wrigley Field when Babe Ruth hit his famous “called-shot” home run in the 1932 World Series.

He joined the Navy the day before the attack on Pearl Harbor, and was awarded the Bronze Star for his service with a Japanese code-breaking team.

Stevens graduated first in his class at Northweste­rn University’s law school, and as a lawyer he became an antitrust expert, experience he brought to Supreme Court rulings such as one ending the NCAA’s control over televised college football games.

President Richard Nixon appointed Stevens, a lifelong Republican, to the federal appeals court in Chicago. Judge Stevens was considered a moderate conservati­ve when Ford — whose nominee would need the approval of a Democratic-controlled Senate — chose him for the Supreme Court.

Stevens won unanimous confirmati­on. His liberal bent once on the high court was “different than I envisioned,” Ford acknowledg­ed decades later, but he still supported and praised him as “a very good legal scholar.”

Stevens’ influence reached its height after other liberals retired in the early 1990s. For a dozen years after, he proved adept at drawing swing votes from Republican appointees Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy, often frustratin­g conservati­ve Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

Stevens’ clout diminished after Roberts arrived in 2005 and O’Connor was replaced by the more conservati­ve Samuel Alito. But he didn’t lose spirit. Throughout his career, Stevens unleashed some of his most memorable language in defeat.

He wrote a scathing dissent in Bush v. Gore, the 2000 case that ended Florida’s presidenti­al recount and anointed George W. Bush: “Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidenti­al election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.”

Stevens is survived by two daughters, Elizabeth and Susan, who were with him when he died. Other survivors include nine grandchild­ren and 13 great-grandchild­ren. Stevens is expected to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery, next to his second wife Maryan.

 ??  ??
 ?? GETTY IMAGES FILES ?? Associate Justice John Paul Stevens poses during a Supreme Court group photograph in 2009.
GETTY IMAGES FILES Associate Justice John Paul Stevens poses during a Supreme Court group photograph in 2009.
 ?? SUN-TIMES FILES ?? John Paul Stevens in 1970
SUN-TIMES FILES John Paul Stevens in 1970
 ?? AP FILES ?? President Gerald Ford and Chief Justice Warren Burger sit with John Paul Stevens (right) after Stevens was sworn in as a Supreme Court justice in December 1975.
AP FILES President Gerald Ford and Chief Justice Warren Burger sit with John Paul Stevens (right) after Stevens was sworn in as a Supreme Court justice in December 1975.
 ?? AP FILES ?? Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens winds up to throw out the first pitch before the start of a game at Wrigley Field in 2005.
AP FILES Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens winds up to throw out the first pitch before the start of a game at Wrigley Field in 2005.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States